You know, with the exception of one deadly and unpredictable midget, this girl is the smallest cargo I've ever had to transport. Yet by far the most troublesome. Does that seem right to you?

Early ,'Objects In Space'


Cable Drama: Still Waiting for the Cable Guy to Show Up with the Thread Name...

To be determined... (but it's definitely [NAFDA])


§ ita § - Nov 29, 2009 5:41:29 pm PST #3674 of 11998
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Feuerstein.


Morgana - Nov 29, 2009 6:05:10 pm PST #3675 of 11998
"I make mistakes, but I am on the side of Good," the Golux said, "by accident and happenchance.” – The 13 Clocks, James Thurber

The presence of a financial manager for a company makes sense, since the doctor brother has no financial concern whatsoever.

That motivation makes sense to me too. What does not make sense is the annoying brother tagging along on medical visits. Why the hell would he be there? There's no logical reason whatsover for him to be riding along on housecalls. Sitting back at the bungalow crunching numbers, fine. Maybe attending an occasional cocktail party and networking. But not going along while the doctor is treating people.


le nubian - Nov 29, 2009 6:07:21 pm PST #3676 of 11998
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

especially since he faints at the sight of blood. WTF?


§ ita § - Nov 29, 2009 6:10:17 pm PST #3677 of 11998
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

But the doctor refuses to bill or talk money with anyone. He'd be running around for free if the brother didn't come along with contracts and bills.

Making the doctor like this might have been dumb, but they did.


JZ - Nov 30, 2009 5:21:58 am PST #3678 of 11998
See? I gave everybody here an opportunity to tell me what a bad person I am and nobody did, because I fuckin' rule.

Does anyone know anything about this new TNT show, with Andre Braugher and Scott Bakula? I like them both (so long as I ignore the existence of Enterprise), but the advertising makes it look kind of meh.

Heh. I did a focus group survey a few weeks ago on ads for that show--they had some stupid, "Guys, you know how hard yet wacky things are at this point in our lives, and the little lady and the rugrats aren't making it any easier, amirite?" ads, some abhorrent, "Ladies, those big overgrown boys you're sleeping with and raising teens with are just such big confused kids themselves, aren't they? Wanna understand them and have some laffs? Check us out!" ads, and some reasonably decent ads featuring actual dialogue, the voices of both male and female characters, and highlighting of Braugher's and Bakula's names.

So I voted good and hard for the third and told the surveyors that the first two were pretty near guaranteed to turn off not just me but most of the people I know, and we're all pretty sturdy Braugher and Bakula fans.

Did it work, or did they go with the awful ads, or did they go with the decent ones but it still sounds "meh"?


Vortex - Nov 30, 2009 5:31:36 am PST #3679 of 11998
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

It still sounds meh, but . . . Andre Braugher! OTOH, Ray Romano (ptui! let us never speak of it again!)


Theodosia - Nov 30, 2009 6:06:48 am PST #3680 of 11998
'we all walk this earth feeling we are frauds. The trick is to be grateful and hope the caper doesn't end any time soon"

I'm for anything that brings Braugher and his lovely family work, but I don't intend to watch it.

Don't confuse the advertising/marketing spiel from USA and the actual programming/programs. I put it in the same category as Cosmopolitan self-consciously slanting itself towards 20somethings when its readers are for the most part women in their 40s and up.


erikaj - Nov 30, 2009 6:12:04 am PST #3681 of 11998
Always Anti-fascist!

It's like Old Guy Entourage...I'm in. With the caveat that I wouldn't want to see even beloved Andre do reverse cowgirl with anybody, but it looks like a pleasant experience with that in mind.


§ ita § - Nov 30, 2009 6:16:47 am PST #3682 of 11998
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Women in their 40s read Cosmo? Seriously? I can't imagine why.


Zenkitty - Nov 30, 2009 6:37:15 am PST #3683 of 11998
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

Why would a woman in her 40s read Cosmo? I mean, by now, don't we already know "What He Really Wants In Bed" and "Seven Secret Moves That Will Drive Your Man Wild In Bed" and "How To Tell If Your Man Is Watching Porn Over Your Shoulder In Bed"?