Honestly BSG was something I AVOIDED because of the original. I still haven't gotten around to catching up with it, but I've got the DVDs because it's come recommended from enough people who's taste I trust.

I haven't heard anything good about Flash Gordon, but I haven't watched it myself.

There's a good reason you haven't heard anything good: It's not good. Except for the scantily clad wimmen.

There's a good reason you haven't heard anything good: It's not good. Except for the scantily clad wimmen.

I get the impression that we're not talking bad the way that the movie was awsomely bad, but just mediocre bad. Am I correct in that assumption?

I get the impression that we're not talking bad the way that the movie was awsomely bad, but just mediocre bad. Am I correct in that assumption?

Yes. Basically, the producers understood the mandate to "modernize" FG to mean that you have to purge it of everything that was fun and cool about the comic strip and the movie.

I still remember listening to an old Flash Gordon radio show (on LP - I'm not THAT old) which had the immortal line "Ahhhh! Smell that oxygen!" Cracks me up every single time I think of it.

Still thinking about the nekkid. A man's virility is to be flaunted, a woman's fecundity to be hidden once she has found herself a virile protector.

A man's virility is to be flaunted, but depending on context, it's also funny, because nakedness means vulnerability, and vulnerability is funny, because humans are mean. A woman's nakedness is vulnerable, but it isn't usually funny unless it's an over-the-top, absurd, slapstick situation. Hm.

I am glad I didn't watch FG. Interested to see how its numbers do.

I don't think male nudity is as often shown as vulnerable. Embarassing and a gaffe, but I can't imagine Colin's scene playing anywhere near as well if written for a woman, because her nudity would be desirable to too many of the people around her.

Again with the reaching, but I handwave it to be why you more often see modesty prohibitions for women than men.

I don't want to imply that female nudity isn't powerful, just that often it isn't power the woman herself can use, unless she's one of those women.

t /generalisation (for now)

Ha! Male nudity that popped up on my blog list (worksafe).

Last season, we had Allyson gratuitously in her underwear and catfighting with Beverly for no better reason than chicks fighting is hawt.

This season, we've got nekkid Carter and shirtless Stark. I call it even.

I don't think male nudity is as often shown as vulnerable.

No, it isn't, it's shown as funny, but I think that's why it's embarrassing and funny. Look at it this way: two random men, neither particularly more powerful or attractive than the other, one is naked, the other clothed. Which one is dominant in that situation; which one has the more stable and powerful social position? The guy with his clothes on. Naked guy = socially subordinate position = vulnerable = mockery = funny. That's why it's especially funny when the guy who's nekkid is a guy who's usually in a more dominant social position (like the local Sheriff). The scene wouldn't have been as funny if, say, Fargo were naked. Fargo being caught naked would just be kinda pathetic. (The funny scene with Fargo was another role-reversal: Fargo as the dominant male, defeating one of the alpha males in the group.) If Donald Trump showed up in Times Square naked, it would be hilarious. The Naked Cowboy walking around Times Square in his skivvies? Amusing, tittillating, not exactly hilarious.

But Naked Cowboy is amusing because he's role-reversing deliberately: men are usually socially dominant, and he's deliberately lowering his social position. So he's amusing, without being mocked. If it were the Naked Cowgirl, it wouldn't be funny. Women are not socially dominant, so while we can lower our social position by appearing in public (half) naked, it isn't funny, because she's lowered her position right out of the range of social acceptability.

I really should be editing.