Hauser: You really think you can solve the problem? Come into Wolfram & Hart and make everything right? Turn night into glorious day? You pathetic little fairy. Angel: I'm not little.

'Just Rewards (2)'


Natter Area 51: The Truthiness Is in Here  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Laura - May 19, 2007 11:05:46 am PDT #8275 of 10001
Our wings are not tired.

I have mixed feelings on the HPV vaccine. If I had a daughter she would absolutely get the vaccine. But I'm not comfortable with the govenment and pharmaceutical companies making it mandatory. It makes sense as a prevention to disease, but so does banning cigarettes, or preventive mastectomy.

The huge profit potention with this particular vaccine makes me skeptical of the real motives behind the push.

That said, I think every young woman should get the vaccine, because cervical cancer, bad.


JZ - May 19, 2007 11:30:06 am PDT #8276 of 10001
See? I gave everybody here an opportunity to tell me what a bad person I am and nobody did, because I fuckin' rule.

The most pernicious thing about HPV, as I understand it, is that the "intimate contact" that spreads it can be a fair amount less intimate than sex; it's a hardy virus and can be transmitted by skin-to-skin contact in non-intercourse cuddling in underwear or bathing suits, the sort of behavior that lots of people think of as safe because there's no penetration, and not even any direct genital contact, just clothed genital proximity. And it sometimes shows up as genital warts in guys, but sometimes not, and often doesn't manifest as anything in gals until that first abnormal Pap smear.

It's just viciously easy to catch without knowing it, viciously easy to carry without knowing it, and viciously easy to spread without knowing it. A mandatory vaccine could make it as nearly extinct as polio in a generation or two. I don't see a downside.


Maria - May 19, 2007 11:34:02 am PDT #8277 of 10001
Not so nice is that I'm about to ruin a Friday morning for a bunch of people because of a series of unfortunate events and an upset foreign government. - shrift

The Laura Bush thing is just a rumour. There's no evidence that she's been staying at the Hay-Adams. Though I hope she does leave him after they depart 1600 Penn. Ave. It would be an excuse for more GWB with his head buried in the sand-fun.


Hil R. - May 19, 2007 11:42:13 am PDT #8278 of 10001
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l

I'm reading People magazine, and they've got an article about the baby that died, whose parents were sentenced a few weeks ago. (The headline is "Did this baby die from a VEGAN DIET?" Um, no. The baby died from being underfed. If his parents had fed him the same amount of cow's milk that they fed him of soy milk, he probably would have still died.)

Anyway. The article mentions a family that's raised their kids vegan since birth, and the kids are fine. It's got this sentence: "Though the kids rank approximately in the 50th percentile for height and weight, they are normal, active children who take multivitamins and eat fortified cereal and soy milk, according to their parents." What on earth is that "though" at the beginning of the sentence supposed to mean?


Jesse - May 19, 2007 11:43:56 am PDT #8279 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Even though they're only precisely of average size...

So, I have sneakers. I'm not entirely sold on them, though. Hmph.


tommyrot - May 19, 2007 11:46:20 am PDT #8280 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Anyway. The article mentions a family that's raised their kids vegan since birth, and the kids are fine. It's got this sentence: "Though the kids rank approximately in the 50th percentile for height and weight, they are normal, active children who take multivitamins and eat fortified cereal and soy milk, according to their parents." What on earth is that "though" at the beginning of the sentence supposed to mean?

Apparently, most kids are above average. Maybe the writer is from Lake Wobegon?


Topic!Cindy - May 19, 2007 12:00:42 pm PDT #8281 of 10001
What is even happening?

That said, I think every young woman should get the vaccine, because cervical cancer, bad.

Me, too. My daughter will get it, mandatory or not. I just object to the government making me do things.

A mandatory vaccine could make it as nearly extinct as polio in a generation or two. I don't see a downside.
The downside I see is infringing upon people's civil liberties. If it is mandated, and a person chooses not to have the vaccine (or if a parent chooses to delay a child's vaccine for whatever reason), what's going to result is that the person cannot get into school. You aren't going to catch HPV in a school setting, so you shouldn't have to be vaccinated against it, to go to school.

That's the only way states "mandate" vaccines. They don't stop everyone at the state line and shoot them up.


Trudy Booth - May 19, 2007 12:06:36 pm PDT #8282 of 10001
Greece's financial crisis threatens to take down all of Western civilization - a civilization they themselves founded. A rather tragic irony - which is something they also invented. - Jon Stewart

My "zap 'em all" had more to do with the feeling that insurance should cover it for everybody because zapping everybody is how you control a disease.

Right now if you're not a woman between, what, nine and twenty six you need to pony up $300+ dollars to get it. My ObGyn suspects that coverage limitation has more to do with available stocks than anything else and that in time it will extend to older women and then to men.

As far as it being mandatory... now that its been linked to oral cancer... if JZs depiction of "intimate contact" is what we're dealing with it probably should.

If its purely intercourse I'm still on the fence -- I can only control my own sexual behavior. I can't control my child's, my partner's, or my child's partner's. Epidemiologically speaking that seems like a lot of risk.


Cashmere - May 19, 2007 12:06:57 pm PDT #8283 of 10001
Now tagless for your comfort.

If it is mandated, and a person chooses not to have the vaccine (or if a parent chooses to delay a child's vaccine for whatever reason), what's going to result is that the person cannot get into school. You aren't going to catch HPV in a school setting, so you shouldn't have to be vaccinated against it, to go to school.

Lots of anti-vac folks are getting wavers--for things like MMR, so I think this one will have opt-out wavers, too.

I get itchy with the anti-vac crowd when it comes to common and dangerous illnesses but I don't see the point in making them get their kids vaccinated. If they lose a child to a common, preventable illness (at any age), it's their loss, not mine.


Trudy Booth - May 19, 2007 12:22:24 pm PDT #8284 of 10001
Greece's financial crisis threatens to take down all of Western civilization - a civilization they themselves founded. A rather tragic irony - which is something they also invented. - Jon Stewart

I do worry about over vaccinating, but the thing that bugs me is the chicken pox vaccine. Sheesh, its just chicken pox... is it mandatory for school?