They're doing it backwards; walking up the down slide.

River ,'Ariel'


Natter Area 51: The Truthiness Is in Here  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Zenkitty - Apr 22, 2007 7:11:07 am PDT #3861 of 10001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

Happy Betsy's Birthday!

Salma looked prettier and sexier in the before picture. More approachable, you know? Someone you could imagine talking to without stammering and coming on to and making out with, without feeling like a weird ugly loser. The ultra-gorgeous new Salma is that kind of sexy that doesn't seem touchable. She's out of everybody's league who isn't up there in George-Clooney land.


§ ita § - Apr 22, 2007 7:27:13 am PDT #3862 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

The new Salma tweaks my Kinsey. She looks lush and demands touching. The old Salma, NSM.

That first Salma picture looks young, too. If she has had a boob job, I'd wager they were bigger when decided to do it. Or she had the boob job before, say, From Dusk Till Dawn. I do remember thinking "Hey! Boobies! Hot!" during her dance number.


Zenkitty - Apr 22, 2007 7:59:47 am PDT #3863 of 10001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

Oddly, neither version of Salma tweaks my Kinsey. Even though my Kinsey rather enjoys being tweaked.


§ ita § - Apr 22, 2007 8:05:26 am PDT #3864 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

She's the closest I've seen to a Unifying Kinsey tweak. Otherwise my tweak taste runs pretty butch.

At least with her, guys don't look at me funny.


Matt the Bruins fan - Apr 22, 2007 8:09:36 am PDT #3865 of 10001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

Salma rocks, but leaves my Kinsey dial unmoved from its usual position.

Though to be fair, even Traci Thoms would have to draft Tyron Leitso to make out with me the whole time if she wanted anything to happen.


Zenkitty - Apr 22, 2007 8:11:03 am PDT #3866 of 10001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

Well, if she were trying to tweak my Kinsey, it'd surely quiver.


§ ita § - Apr 22, 2007 8:20:24 am PDT #3867 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

if she were trying to tweak my Kinsey, it'd surely quiver.

I swear she's trying to tweak mine. Right now. Weird.

This past week I've received thanks for having a good coverage of black men on my sites and from another surfer, thumbs up for covering some non-Hollywood Asian actresses (although I was then left with a huge list which'll require research after I get back from krav).

It's not something I do on purpose, but I do know how irritating it can be when your idea of hot isn't quite aligned with the flavour du jour. So if I can 'help' some of those folk, it's kinda cool.


Connie Neil - Apr 22, 2007 8:30:35 am PDT #3868 of 10001
brillig

Salma doesn't budge my Kinsey needle at all, neither version. I wonder if the wires are hooked up right.


Cashmere - Apr 22, 2007 8:52:57 am PDT #3869 of 10001
Now tagless for your comfort.

Happy Birthday, Betsy!


tommyrot - Apr 22, 2007 10:53:06 am PDT #3870 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

An article in Modern Mechanics blog on a 1939 article on "splitting the atom" - i.e. nuclear fission: [link]

Commentary in the blog entry:

This is pretty amazing. It’s a Scientific American Article from 1939 describing the splitting of the atom. It was written just after Einstien had written his famous letter to F.D.R and before the initiation of the Manhattan Project, yet it is obvious that scientists were well aware of the potential uses of atomic fission...

Interesting to read in that this was a phenomena that had just been discovered (by German scientists). The final four paragraphs are the money quote:

Joliot, as well as groups of physicists at Columbia, the Carnegie Institution, and Cambridge University, have concentrated on the study of secondary neutrons emitted at the moment of fission and in later reactions.

The latter problem brings up an interesting and rather disturbing aspect of the case. These secondary neutrons constitute a fresh supply of “bullets” to produce new fissions. Thus we are faced with a vicious circle, with one explosion setting off another, and energy being continuously and cumulatively released. It is probable that a sufficiently large mass of uranium would be explosive if its atoms once got well started dividing. As a matter of fact, the scientists are pretty nervous over the dangerous forces they are unleashing, and are hurriedly devising means to control them.

It may or may not be significant that, since early spring, no accounts of research on nuclear fission have been heard from Germany — not even from discoverer Hahn. It is not unlikely that the German government, spotting a potentially powerful weapon of war, has imposed military secrecy on all recent German investigations. A large concentration of isotope 235, subjected to neutron bombardment, might conceivably blow up all London or Paris.

It has been impossible, even in this long article, to mention all the thousand aspects of this fascinating phenomenon, or name many of the able contributors to the sum of information amassed since last January. But the fact remains that nuclear fission is the most important scientific discovery of the year, and holds who knows what promise for the future.