Angel: You know, I killed my actual dad. It was one of the first things I did when I became a vampire. Wesley: I hardly see how that's the same situation. Angel: Yeah. I didn't really think that one through.

'Lineage'


Spike's Bitches 35: We Got a History  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


beekaytee - May 16, 2007 10:10:23 am PDT #9034 of 10003
Compassionately intolerant

Every department store within easy reach is pretty much carrying only capri leggings. No actual tights.

I don't wear hose, I wear tights. I certainly do not wear capri leggings. I didn't in the 80s, I won't know.

Raq feels my pain. What has happened to retail lately. I may not be much of a shopper, but I'm pretty sure I've bought tights in the last couple of years...now I can't find the kind I like anywhere.

I've never worn hose...just black tights. I want good ones now!


§ ita § - May 16, 2007 10:11:31 am PDT #9035 of 10003
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Nope, here too.

There's no reason it can't be a product of your region too.

Last time I went stockings and frilly sock shopping here in LA, there was plenty of hose and plenty pairs of tights. Such is the way.


SuziQ - May 16, 2007 10:13:20 am PDT #9036 of 10003
Back tattoos of the mother is that you are absolutely right - Ame

Raq - MAC requires $50 toward product to do your face. Sephora and Bare Escentuals will do with the hopes of winning you over to spend ooooodles, but nothing is required. YMakeupCounterMV.


Atropa - May 16, 2007 10:14:23 am PDT #9037 of 10003
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.

There's no reason it can't be a product of your region too.

It's happening here, too. Footless tights and capri leggings as far as the eye can see. I do not understand the point of fishnet capri leggings. Thank goodness for www.sock-dreams.com, that's all I'm sayin'.


Toddson - May 16, 2007 10:14:26 am PDT #9038 of 10003
Friends don't let friends read "Atlas Shrugged"

I'm wearing a skirt for the first time in a year ... and remembering why I hate pantyhose. bleah.


lisah - May 16, 2007 10:16:07 am PDT #9039 of 10003
Punishingly Intricate

Love sock-dreams!

HATE the word "hose" in the "pantyhose" context....don't mind it in the "firehose" context.


Toddson - May 16, 2007 10:17:42 am PDT #9040 of 10003
Friends don't let friends read "Atlas Shrugged"

Or how about stockings, with a nice garter belt?


Connie Neil - May 16, 2007 10:18:47 am PDT #9041 of 10003
brillig

What has happened to retail lately.

For a couple of years I could not find skirts anywhere, it was just god-damned capris. I was so thrilled to see skirts coming back in fashion.


Atropa - May 16, 2007 10:19:08 am PDT #9042 of 10003
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.

Raq - MAC requires $50 toward product to do your face.

They do? Huh, the fabulous kids at my local MAC counters and store never mentioned that to me. Of course, they're probably well-aware that I can be talked into spending that much pretty easily.


§ ita § - May 16, 2007 10:25:35 am PDT #9043 of 10003
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Or how about stockings, with a nice garter belt?

Now *that's* a bitch to shop for around here. For your other hosiery needs, feel free to come over to West LA.

I've never had a problem as big as an entire sort of (what I consider a) clothing staple disappear due to trends--it's a styling issue. Most impact right now is where the waistband on pants hit. I am perfectly willing to wear some lower rise pants, but my shirts have to not only be longer, they have to be shaped. Therein lay my problem. Right now any pants that need to fit precisely below my waist fit like crap most everywhere else, so I'm trying to avoid the lower waist styles in general.