'Get It Done'
Discussion of Buffy and Angel comics, books, and more. Please don't get into spoilery details in the first week of release.
This:
But I'm still from an early enough American generation to find men claiming to act like overly dramatic little girls just a little bit cringe-making.
Continues to chafe my snatch.
I'm trying to figure out the Ultimate Combo of Offense. Right now, I've got Willingham writing, Byrne drawing... who else do I need to add?
My ultimate combo of offense involves .. well, Liefeld getting paid to do anything other than bring (note I did not say make) coffee in the comic industry. All else pales.
I'm trying to figure out the Ultimate Combo of Offense. Right now, I've got Willingham writing, Byrne drawing... who else do I need to add?
Kevin Dooley editing so there are girlfriends-in-refrigerators aplenty?
Though the Crisis spoilers, if they turn out to be true, sound more interesting than offensive.
Also, Jason Todd, at last viewing: still more grey than evil. Sheesh.
I'm wondering if the camp of us that really enjoyed Under the Hood is just awfully quiet on account of fearing the reaction of the rest of the world, or if I'm a camp of one.
Kevin Dooley editing so there are girlfriends-in-refrigerators aplenty?
Woo! Cold girlfriend sandwiches for EVERYBODY!
Liefeld does the cover.
The plot is... hmm. It needs a plot. Girls gone wild, evil, and dead preferred.
I wouldn't call the spoilers offensive so much as pointlessly alienating.
I don't want any of them to happen unless they're reversible.
And I don't want them to be reversible, because then what's the point?
Well, they make enough logical sense that I can go with them.
Unlike, say Batman 644. Which makes less sense than As You Were, for dog's sake.
Huh. The Powers that comes out tomorrow is a super-gigantic anniversary issue.
And, The Runaways was in this week's "must" list in Entertainment Weekly.