Xander: How? What? How? Giles: Three excellent questions.

Xander/Giles ,'Never Leave Me'


Other Media  

Discussion of Buffy and Angel comics, books, and more. Please don't get into spoilery details in the first week of release.


shrift - Dec 07, 2004 5:17:59 pm PST #6889 of 10000
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty

Man. I'm not sure how many of you saw the genesis of the Scary Bat-God reference in comics chat -- I wonder if Te put that in her memories...

t wanders off to search


§ ita § - Dec 08, 2004 7:57:40 am PST #6890 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Christ. I just lent a co-worker Y: Last Man, and now I want to take it back. I forgot there were boobies. I must make a note not to hand him Fables either.

I read Hush, and am sad. I thought it was Tommy, and then I thought it wasn't, and then ... poor Bruce.

However, the love story bothered me. It's not Batman/Bruce in love, because I kinda liked the whole Sasha revelation in Fugitive 3. I just don't get why her. I even prefer Talia.


Matt the Bruins fan - Dec 08, 2004 8:08:39 am PST #6891 of 10000
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

Lend him the one where Yorick reminisces about losing his virginity—the reaction to that ought to be entertaining.


shrift - Dec 08, 2004 10:29:19 am PST #6892 of 10000
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty

I keep forgetting that my comics have, like, bondage and sex and nudity and violence and gore and profanity and other controversial stuff. Some relatives were over for Thanksgiving while I was catching up on a giant stack of comics, and some of them were exclaiming, "I haven't seen one of these in years!" Got all grabby-hands. I wasn't bothered until I recalled that so many of my comics were not family friendly like whoa.

Had to do some fast swapping out with less interesting titles.


§ ita § - Dec 08, 2004 10:47:06 am PST #6893 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I'd previously lent this guy Red Son -- innocuous, and then The Ultimates, which he proposed reading to his son. Yeah. Talked him out of that.

Finally I have TT #18. Hey! Fun! Dead people! Bad people!

Something in X4 annoyed me. Well, two things. The thing about which I write was a categorisation of heroes. In which reality are Johnny Storm, Storm Storm and Cyclops energy-emitting supers, and Gambit isn't? I don't think I'll be getting the rest of teh series.


Kalshane - Dec 08, 2004 11:01:55 am PST #6894 of 10000
GS: If you had to choose between kicking evil in the head or the behind, which would you choose, and why? Minsc: I'm not sure I understand the question. I have two feet, do I not? You do not take a small plate when the feast of evil welcomes seconds.

Maybe they're saying Gambit converts matter into energy instead of simply creating it? But I was under the impression he imbued objects with energy, since he talks about "charging" things so it does seem weird.


§ ita § - Dec 08, 2004 11:02:53 am PST #6895 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

When you place it in context -- who's going on the rescue mission to a space station (as in, Gambit gets to go, the other three don't) -- the categorisation seems even weirder.

And they open with what must be the world's dumbest "we're heroes, but we fight upon meeting" brawl. Surely they're a bit more mature than that. ALL of them.


Thomash - Dec 08, 2004 11:04:57 am PST #6896 of 10000
I have a plan.

But I was under the impression he imbued objects with energy, since he talks about "charging" things so it does seem weird.

I was under that impression as well. That he 'converted' an objects potential or actual kinetic energy into explosive energy (?).


Kalshane - Dec 08, 2004 11:07:26 am PST #6897 of 10000
GS: If you had to choose between kicking evil in the head or the behind, which would you choose, and why? Minsc: I'm not sure I understand the question. I have two feet, do I not? You do not take a small plate when the feast of evil welcomes seconds.

Huh. And what was their reasoning why energy-creating supers couldn't go ?


§ ita § - Dec 08, 2004 11:09:27 am PST #6898 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Because there might have been structural damage to the space station.

NO SENSE AT ALL. Maybe there's a concern about sparking leaking oxygen for an explosion, but that hardly accounts for letting Gambit go up, and leaving Cyclops.