Okay -- that makes sense to me. I was wondering whether what I had perceived as Bats having a no kill policy was more a no gun policy and that he felt free to kill villains by other mean.s
Other Media
Discussion of Buffy and Angel comics, books, and more. Please don't get into spoilery details in the first week of release.
Nope. You interpreted correctly.
As Dick said, rule number one, we don't kill.
Rule number two, we wear tights.
And now I've got to leave.
we wear tights
Unless we go with the freshly-waxed look; viz. Robin costumes 1 and 2.
So the Robin 1 and 2 costumes were worn while the wearer was old enough to need to wax? Very wrong.
Suddenly I want to see the older kid from Summerland as Robin. I don't know if it's because I'm sick and it has something to do with his depilation. Hope not.
So the Robin 1 and 2 costumes were worn while the wearer was old enough to need to wax? Very wrong.
We're pretty certain Dick STILL waxes.
We're pretty certain Dick STILL waxes.
When he isn't living on a fire escape and can get to the salon, anyway.
::thinking wrong thoughts::
As Dick said, rule number one, we don't kill.
Altough, back in the earliest days of Batman, he wasn't averse to dropping villians off of fatal heights, into vats of acid, or forcing them to fall on their own blades.
While I'm trying very hard not to get sucked back in as a regular reader (time, $$$, and an-obsessive-tendency-towards-completism issues), I wallowing in the Bat-love around here. I became a fan because I liked re-runs of the silly show as a kid (yes, I'll admit it), but Bats became my favorite because his original debut story was the darkest comic I'd ever read up to that point, followed closely by the first appearence of the Joker. For years it was the darkest, outside of horror comics.