They would. They really, really would.
Wasn't Superboy concerned a few months back about having Luthor DNA as if evil were a congenital defect?
Xander ,'End of Days'
Discussion of Buffy and Angel comics, books, and more. Please don't get into spoilery details in the first week of release.
They would. They really, really would.
Wasn't Superboy concerned a few months back about having Luthor DNA as if evil were a congenital defect?
Wasn't Superboy concerned a few months back about having Luthor DNA as if evil were a congenital defect?
Yep, he sure was.
Wasn't Superboy concerned a few months back about having Luthor DNA as if evil were a congenital defect?
Knowing Kon, he was more concerned about the male pattern baldness.
He's worried about evil and not baldness? Where are the boy's priorities?
Yeah. I know. Had to go for the snark anyway. Don't mind me.
edit: Ha! Fabulous x-post. Also, the gods have decreed that New Comics Day = Amy Walks Home In The Rain Day. Amy will foil the gods (and stun her boss!) by staying to do more work.
Because then DC could act as if martial arts skill, like archery skill, is genetic.
Don't they? I thought just about everything was genetic unless you have to make a mundane special ... and then it's incredibly heritable from there on in.
Thanks, Steph -- I kinda figured those were of her. But with all the name confusion, questioned everything.
Holy Mother of Crossposts, Batman!
Heh. Now, I can get someone like Raven being worried about a wormy apple in the family tree, what with Daddy's control issues including actually possessing his offspring and all. But for most people, the character of biological parents that had no hand in the upbringing isn't terribly important unless their character issues are tied to something physical like alcoholism. You'd think by the time DC started dealing with real-world spaceflight, they'd have dropped the "sins of the fathers" hooey.
I put this month's and last month's Robins on hold -- because I bought -- two NW tpbs, Astounding X-Men (2 copies -- one for a friend), the first book of "Nevermore" and a GC back issue.
So, are you guys saying that Batman is no longer the "Dark Knight" but more the "Kind of Jolly Knight" now that Step is Robin?
Do the Batman in the eponymous title and the Batman in Robin's title share continuity? I don't read either, but the whitefont is making me curious about this fact.
I think that they do. . . unless your talking about the Dark Knight Returns, then no.
Batman eponymous is running a little behind Robin right now.