The HTML looked fine to you too, Jon?
Yeah. Seemed compliant.
Pttttht! DX
Zoe: Uh huh. River, honey? He's putting the hair away now. River: It'll still be there... waiting.
'Jaynestown'
Buffistas Building a Better Board
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Jon B. - May 18, 2005 10:04:30 am PDT #9886 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
aurelia - May 18, 2005 11:08:59 am PDT #9887 of 10000
All sorrows can be borne if you put them into a story. Tell me a story.
Fixed now, but before not only were all the posts after Eddie's whitefonted, the time/date stamp and the tags were also blinvisible. It was bluefont only.
DXMachina - May 18, 2005 11:53:21 am PDT #9888 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
I'm assuming you mean only the links showed? (My links aren't blue.)
Still have no idea why it would do that. Is it only in Safari?
aurelia - May 18, 2005 12:11:15 pm PDT #9889 of 10000
All sorrows can be borne if you put them into a story. Tell me a story.
Yes, the links. The user name, post number, mark and block.
I am using Safari.
Eddie - May 18, 2005 1:20:06 pm PDT #9890 of 10000
Your tag here.
Hi, sorry for the trouble; I'm surprised my ownself. I am appreciating the irony though.
My only theory is the Safari HTML parser might be interpreting the stars as the start of a comment which would negate the font close tag. It's a bit of a stretch, but it's all I got.
DXMachina - May 18, 2005 2:51:06 pm PDT #9891 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
I don't think so. It went away after I put the quote marks around 'white'.
§ ita § - May 18, 2005 3:40:17 pm PDT #9892 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Not for everyone -- or was there repeated editing?
DXMachina - May 18, 2005 4:11:49 pm PDT #9893 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Ah, didn't see Kat's post. I thought that did it. WTF?
And why couldn't she see it once Perkins could? That makes even less sense.
§ ita § - May 18, 2005 4:25:06 pm PDT #9894 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
You want less sense? I edited the font tag back in, and could see it in Safari just fine.
DXMachina - May 18, 2005 4:26:53 pm PDT #9895 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Could it be a Tiger-Panther-Other thing?