Yeah, I was thinking that. Good suggestion.
I like money better than people. People can so rarely be exchanged for goods and/or services!
Willow ,'Showtime'
Buffistas Building a Better Board
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
DXMachina - Feb 13, 2005 6:37:55 am PST #9519 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Jesse - Feb 13, 2005 6:42:01 am PST #9520 of 10000
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Fabu!
§ ita § - Feb 13, 2005 6:44:04 am PST #9521 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Looks good, DX. Apart from what Jon suggested, do you think the following sentence should have a question mark?
Can't remember what all those posts you bookmarked were about.
Deena - Feb 13, 2005 6:44:37 am PST #9522 of 10000
How are you me? You need to stop that. Only I can be me. ~Kara
Very nice, DX. Better and less wordy than I would have done.
DXMachina - Feb 13, 2005 6:55:34 am PST #9523 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
do you think the following sentence should have a question mark?
Yes it should.
eta: I edited the original post to include Jon and ita's corrections.
P.M. Marc - Feb 13, 2005 7:10:41 am PST #9524 of 10000
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
Jess, I don't know if it's a length issue. I didn't mess with the tail end of things (I stuck the new store in the middle), so it could be.
Lilty Cash - Feb 13, 2005 11:06:35 am PST #9525 of 10000
"You see? THAT's what they want. Love, and a bit with a dog."
Pokes nose in.
I'm without skills and have nothing to contribute to BBaBB, but I like to read it because it's interesting. I just wanted to sneak in to say that you guys do remarkable things and they are much appriciated.
Runs back to the lurky corner.
DXMachina - Feb 13, 2005 11:27:52 am PST #9526 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
ita, I've archived another 11 threads, and all are ready for cleaning out. That's about it. There's really nothing else to be zipped at this point.
§ ita § - Feb 13, 2005 7:51:13 pm PST #9527 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Thanks, DX. The table has been cleaned. I'm going to add the full text index, and it may make the site unpostable for a little, while MySQL does its thang.
Am-Chau Yarkona - Feb 13, 2005 11:03:04 pm PST #9528 of 10000
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty
Type in a word or two that you can recall from the post, "pumpkin" and "avocado" for example, and hit [OK]. You'll be presented with a list of posts in the thread that have those keywords in them.
The way this is written implies that your search results will be posts that have both "pumpkin" and "avocado", but testing on b.net shows that the search uses 'or' rather than 'and' (reference). It would be useful to tell people that in the documentation. Perhaps "that has one or other of those keywords in"?