Yeah, that's what I mean, Jon. MSIE6, Win2K. To get mine to show up blank like that, I used <BR>s.
My source code shows:
<p>
<li>
</li>
</p>
<HR etc.>
No new paragraph before the header.
Early: You folks are all insane. Simon: Well, my sister's a ship. We had a complicated childhood.
'Objects In Space'
Buffistas Building a Better Board
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Polter-Cow - Feb 06, 2005 9:36:54 am PST #9440 of 10000
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!
Dana - Feb 06, 2005 9:38:30 am PST #9441 of 10000
"I'm useless alone." // "We're all useless alone. It's a good thing you're not alone."
Do you mean that the is on the same line as the bullet?
Not on my screen, btw. WinXP Pro, IE6.
Hil R. - Feb 06, 2005 9:39:50 am PST #9442 of 10000
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l
It's showing up on separate lines for me, too. WinXP, Mozilla.
Dana - Feb 06, 2005 9:41:16 am PST #9443 of 10000
"I'm useless alone." // "We're all useless alone. It's a good thing you're not alone."
Wait, now it is. That's bizarre.
DXMachina - Feb 06, 2005 9:59:18 am PST #9444 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Looks okay to me in Firefox, which tends to be finicky.
Here's the source I see:
Things I've accomplished so far:
</p>
<p>
</p><li>
</li>
<p></p>
t hr align="left" noshade="noshade" size="2" width="75%"
-t - Feb 07, 2005 7:42:09 am PST #9445 of 10000
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration
I'm seeing the bullet followed immediately by the line, using IE 6.0 on a Windows machine
Am-Chau Yarkona - Feb 09, 2005 6:48:12 am PST #9446 of 10000
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty
Is there any kind of reason why Gudanov's Sang Sacre post, over a month after the last one, has a duplicated number? I was very confused when the thread went to the top of my Message Centre without apparently having any new posts in, but I guess it's because of the mis-numbering.
Nilly - Feb 09, 2005 6:53:53 am PST #9447 of 10000
Swouncing
Am-Chau, it was the result of something ita had to do: msbelle "Buffistas Building a Better Board" Jan 6, 2005 8:17:52 am PST (ita's post, not msbelle's, with the same post #).
§ ita § - Feb 09, 2005 6:58:54 am PST #9448 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
msbelle "Buffistas Building a Better Board" Jan 6, 2005 8:17:52 am PST, Am-Chau.
It looks like we can yank variable styles/style sheets from the request list, and mark some other things rolled out ("enforce no posting after the thread has reached 10,000 posts", "fix the missing first post issue"), others completed (but not tested or rolled out) (design Stompy image, an admin only quick edit (!STOMP) that's replaced with the stompy image, Ability to label bookmarks, Jump to date in thread). I'm also of the opinion that things I wanted better specs on that no one spoke up for should also be dropped due to lack of demonstrated interest.
DXMachina - Feb 09, 2005 7:01:28 am PST #9449 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
It looks like we can yank variable styles/style sheets from the request list
There was a least some interest in this. Why are we dropping it?