Isn't there the issue of tags like t br getting tidied with a closing t /b ?

Or do we not care about that? Or is that this phantom thing you're talking about?

Isn't there the issue of tags like <br> getting tidied with a closing </b> ?

Is that an issue here, or with Gus's new code? I didn't notice it with the new stuff.

eta: Huh. Tags did NOT get stripped in the quoted text. Not good. I wonder why that was.

I didn't notice it with the new stuff.

Jon's right. A <BR> gets converted to a <bR>, and gets closed with a </b>. In addition, I've noticed excessive closing of anchors (it goes ahead and closes them even if I've already done so). So far, I can't see how they can cause problems, per se, but they're so unpretty.

Jon's right.

In the code that Gus is testing, or here?

Here.

Then it doesn't matter, since Gus is working on entirely new code -- only the tidying bugs there are an issue.

Didn't get to this today. Not that there would have been a lot of difference between what my alchy roomy might have done and what I would have done about it today. Switching between Posix and regex is giving me crossed eyes.

Groats.

Wait. At one point the version of code in gus.net was going to be brought even with the code in b.net. Did that happen? I think I was waiting for that, before chasing ghosts.

I think I was waiting for that, before chasing ghosts.

It's done, as of the fourth -- I copied over all the b.org and the b.net code into subdirectories at gus.net.

However, more stuff has been gone live since then, so the b.org code is out of date (but the b.net is still the same). Do you need that refreshed?

Likely not. I'll work off the b.net version, now that I know to look for that subdirectory.