Inara: So, explain to me again why Zoe wasn't in the dress? Mal: Tactics, woman. Needed her in the back. 'Sides, those soft cotton dresses feel kinda nice. It's the whole... air-flow.

'Our Mrs. Reynolds'


Buffistas Building a Better Board  

Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.

To-do list


Rob - Oct 23, 2002 4:30:10 pm PDT #874 of 10000

It looks fine in Mozilla. (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016). I think Rio might need to upgrade to a more recent version of Netscape Communicator to see it right.


Holli - Oct 23, 2002 5:41:50 pm PDT #875 of 10000
an overblown libretto and a sumptuous score/ could never contain the contradictions I adore

I'm on AOL and a green iMac-- looks fine.


DXMachina - Oct 23, 2002 6:13:21 pm PDT #876 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

Mozilla on the PC is fine, but in Netscape 4.78, there's no size change.

Testing

edit: Nope, no joy in Netscape


Jon B. - Oct 23, 2002 6:51:30 pm PDT #877 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

OK, I've got Netscape 4.79 on my home PC, and it's also not doing the small font thing. Lemme try one more thing:

Am I small?

Nope. Definitely a Netscape 4.X bug.


DXMachina - Oct 23, 2002 6:58:22 pm PDT #878 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

Nope. Definitely a Netscape 4.X bug.

Yeah, but it works on Netscape over at WX.


Jon B. - Oct 23, 2002 7:05:26 pm PDT #879 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

Wow, you're right! I looked at the page source for posts on both systems and neither one is altering the font tag. I wonder if it's another browser-won't-override-the-stylesheet issue?


DXMachina - Oct 23, 2002 8:20:25 pm PDT #880 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

Could be. There's also that thing with the font and pre tags in Netscape that I experimented with last week:

DXMachina "Buffistas Building a Better Board" Oct 11, 2002 8:58:01 pm EDT

This place (and LiveJournal) pretty much forced me to move from Netscape to Mozilla. Too many gotchas. OTOH, I have all sorts of problems using Mozilla with the Microsoft Knowledge Base. You can't frelling win.


Jessica - Oct 23, 2002 8:22:41 pm PDT #881 of 10000
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?

FWIW, all of those have looked small in Opera. (er, all that were supposed to. the rest looked normal-sized)


Jon B. - Oct 23, 2002 8:40:20 pm PDT #882 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

It's a stylesheet issue. Simply having

p  {  font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 14px; font-style: normal}
in the stylesheet, or just in a t style tag in the page header, is preventing the font size tag from working. Actually, it's the font-size parameter specifically that's causing the problem.

And it's not the same px vs. pt issue that was brought up earlier. I tried using pt instead of px and the Netscape 4.x bug remained.

I don't know what we can do.


DXMachina - Oct 23, 2002 9:27:34 pm PDT #883 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

Instead of using a point or pixel size for message text, can you just leave the size parameter out of the style sheet (edit:) for the message text? Then the browser default size would be in effect, and there would be nothing to override a user changing the font size, right? It would only be necessary for the message text.