From "Gone":
WILLOW
It was nothing. I didn't slip--
XANDER
Will, nobody's mad. Relapse is part of recovery. We understand that. We just have to figure away to fix it.
WILLOW
Fix what?
XANDER
Fix Buffy.
WILLOW
Buffy's broken?
XANDER
You know what I-- You don't know?
(off her confusion) Rhymes with "blinvisible?"
WILLOW
What?
XANDER
Buffy was in town, leaving the haircutting place, when she suddenly--
WILLOW
Buffy cut her hair?
XANDER
Yeah. It's adorable. Apparently. I, personally, couldn't tell since she's all... blinvisible.
How this? Is this enough?
Blinvisible?
When you use the blocking feature (link to FAQ entry?) to hide another person's posts, we like to say they were rendered blinvisible. We've borrowed it from the season 6 episode "Gone":
XANDER Buffy was in town, leaving the haircutting place, when she suddenly--
WILLOW Buffy cut her hair?
XANDER Yeah. It's adorable. Apparently. I, personally, couldn't tell since she's all... blinvisible.
But it doesn't explain that Xander was trying to find a word that rhymes with invisible. It's really something that's was easier to explain when everyone on the board was watching the same show.
Why did we veto Marcie again?
Why did we veto Marcie again?
1) Some posters find the name itself distasteful or disturbing, as it was based on the girl who was permanently disappeared by her unpopularity.
2) Some posters find cutesy acronymic names for what should be quietly-done functions to be nails-on-a-blackboard horrible.
I'm not understanding. You only have to block a particular person once to block all their posts. You can temporarily unblock single posts as needed.
This is almost, but not quite, entirely unlike what I meant. Sorry for the confusion. Never even considered such a permutation. I was talking about blocking all users, not blocking all the posts from a single user.
I'm not sure being able to block everyone at once is particularly desirable. If you're going to do that, you might as well just leave the board and set up a Live Journal.
The block everyone at once was the first step in the two step I proposed before it was explained to me the post labels remain. The second step was to uncheck the people you want to read.
I basically proposed that it would be easier, sometimes, to block everyone, and then unblock the one, two or ten people you wanted to read, rather than go through and block large quantities by making repetitive clicks for each person.
Say you had a group of twelve core Buffistas you wanted to catch up on, and you were 8000 posts behind in Natter. Selecting "block all," and then unchecking the twelve people would be much faster than to search for each name individually.
That's all I was suggesting. Again, sorry for the confusion.
Say you had a group of twelve core Buffistas you wanted to catch up on, and you were 8000 posts behind in Natter. Selecting "block all," and then unchecking the twelve people would be much faster than to search for each name individually.
I'm opposed to this type of usage of the filter on principle. I can't articulate why right now but it gives me a very queasy feeling.
Oh yes, it could be abused, of that I can't deny.
