No, the first time a write-in was used was in last week's informal poll.
'Shindig'
Buffistas Building a Better Board
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Okay, cool. I'm toying with the data model, and that doesn't fit properly right yet.
Actually, I forgot about this one [link] where people had to pick a number between 2 and 100, and later a number between 1 and 10.
Urrgh.
Numbers are basically easy, but then there's checking the bounds.
Well, that's what versions are for.
The people who did [link] are fabulous. Thank you very, very much.
The weremonkey, you mean.
Mighty is the wisdom and power of the weremonkey.
I am glad people are enjoying the [link] thing. It was far and away the simplest piece of coding in that last batch.
I was thinking of extending it to either show the domain of the link (like: [www.site.org]) or to enable provision of the anchor text, with {raw url}::check this out:: becoming check this out.
Thoughts?
I agree with the first (I find I don't click on [link] much because it lacks context).
As for the second -- it's another thing to learn. And once you're learning, why not learn something transferable like t a href="" instead?
As for the second -- it's another thing to learn.
That is precisely what was bothering me about it. Not so intuitive.
I forget, ita, is the code in gus.buffistas the one to work with? I also need to look at the hypenation thing.