Lorne: You know what they say about people who need people. Connor: They're the luckiest people in the world. Lorne: You been sneaking peeks at my Streisand collection again, Kiddo? Connor: Just kinda popped out.

'Time Bomb'


Buffistas Building a Better Board  

Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.

To-do list


Gus - Oct 09, 2004 11:34:01 am PDT #8348 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

Should the post-splitter (for posts longer than 4K) [A] mark the sub-posts as read and take the author to the last post of the entry, or [B] should it leave the author at the first post?

If we use [A], there is some small chance that another poster might make an entry on the thread that could be posted "between" two sections of the long post, so the author of the long post might miss something someone else said.

The [B] scenario may not seem intuitive.


Polter-Cow - Oct 09, 2004 11:38:17 am PDT #8349 of 10000
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

I like [B] better, actually. It doesn't seem counterintuitive because normally you get reset to the beginning of your post, and a multipost is just a really long post.


Deena - Oct 09, 2004 11:38:41 am PDT #8350 of 10000
How are you me? You need to stop that. Only I can be me. ~Kara

I think leave the author at the first post. When you go back to a thread in which you were the last poster the last time you read it (I don't know how to say that better) the first post shown is always your post.


§ ita § - Oct 09, 2004 11:39:08 am PDT #8351 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

It doesn't seem counterintuitive because normally you get reset to the beginning of your post

It depends how you look at it. You also get reset to the end of your post, and a multipost is just a really long post.


Topic!Cindy - Oct 09, 2004 11:40:41 am PDT #8352 of 10000
What is even happening?

I like B.

Don't we usually get reset to the post above our own most recent posts?


Polter-Cow - Oct 09, 2004 11:44:25 am PDT #8353 of 10000
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

You also get reset to the end of your post, and a multipost is just a really long post.

Don't we usually get reset to the post above our own most recent posts?

I wanted to say yes to both and wondered how it could be, but then I remembered: Cindy's right about where the thread page begins, and ita's right about where you are on the page.


§ ita § - Oct 09, 2004 11:44:46 am PDT #8354 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Don't we usually get reset to the post above our own most recent posts?

Yes. But when you post just one post, that's one post above the next post.

When your post gets broken into 30, that's a few pages away from the next post.

I want to make sure everyone's aware that they won't just be reading one of their posts, as we are accustomed, but a potentially large number of posts lie between them and the end of the thread.


Topic!Cindy - Oct 09, 2004 11:50:44 am PDT #8355 of 10000
What is even happening?

If one of my long posts got split into bunches of posts, I'd want to come back to the beginning of the whole slew, to see all those errors which hide while I'm checking it over, and then leap at me, only after the post has been submitted.


§ ita § - Oct 09, 2004 11:54:08 am PDT #8356 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Well, when you put it that way...


Gus - Oct 09, 2004 6:56:24 pm PDT #8357 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

ita, Those changes are in.

postProcess.php and post.php have been altered. I didn't move tagpairs. Whatever you want to do about that could be applied to the arrays in _quickedit(), as well, I reckon.