Occasionally I'm callous and strange.

Willow ,'The Killer In Me'


Buffistas Building a Better Board  

Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.

To-do list


tommyrot - Jun 09, 2004 6:00:50 pm PDT #7930 of 10000
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

The problem looks like when the form loads, the replyto field on the form has a vaule of the user name and the user email address, when it only needs to have the email address. When the user submist the form, both the user name and the user email gets posted to the server, causing the email validity testing function to return false.

I think. I don't have the whole code in front of me, as I'm watching X-men United.

edit: I don't understand how the code for buffistas.org does works... unless that code is different.


§ ita § - Jun 09, 2004 6:09:46 pm PDT #7931 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I went and tested and it works just fine for me -- it may very well be punctuation in the username that sets it off.

We'll need to put that on the list, and hope someone with regex knowhow steps up for it.

tommy -- you have precisely the code that's running here.


Gus - Jun 09, 2004 6:15:32 pm PDT #7932 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

I do regex.


tommyrot - Jun 09, 2004 6:30:27 pm PDT #7933 of 10000
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

The problem's not with regex. The function with the regex test was getting passed the user name, not the user email.

I'll have more details after X-Men is over.


§ ita § - Jun 09, 2004 6:34:56 pm PDT #7934 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

The function with the regex test was getting passed the user name, not the user email.

I'll go dig into the code, but since it seems to think "ita" is a valid e-mail address, then we do have a problem with the regex anyway.

So thanks, Gus.


Gus - Jun 09, 2004 6:37:14 pm PDT #7935 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

Cool. Point me at it, via the profile addy...


tommyrot - Jun 09, 2004 6:38:27 pm PDT #7936 of 10000
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

But I can use the form on buffistas.org, but not sql.buffistas.net. Maybe the function is getting passed the email address on buffistas.org.


§ ita § - Jun 09, 2004 6:38:35 pm PDT #7937 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

What gets passed to the validation is "$_user->name <$_user->email>"

The regex is supposed to be able to accept "Jon. B <jonb@whatever.com>" as a valid e-mail address. It is not. However, it likes "ita <ita@wherever.com>" just fine. Which is why the problem is not in what's passed, but in how it's parsed.


§ ita § - Jun 09, 2004 6:39:31 pm PDT #7938 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Maybe the function is getting passed the email address on buffistas.org.

It's exactly the same code, tommyrot. What's different is your username, and your e-mail address. Register at .net with tommyrot and see if it works.

eta: I can send e-mail to the admins at .net just fine


Jon B. - Jun 09, 2004 6:49:15 pm PDT #7939 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

The problem looks like when the form loads, the replyto field on the form has a vaule of the user name and the user email address, when it only needs to have the email address. When the user submist the form, both the user name and the user email gets posted to the server, causing the email validity testing function to return false.

That's how I remember it. Why it doesn't fail sometimes, I dunno. In any case, validating against user->email only should do the trick.