What Jon said. It would be nice if all browsers played like Opera (she says AGAIN) and closed all inline tags at the end of a paragraph, but they don't.
So I will code to close opened tags, but it's going to take a bit of logicking, and hopefully I won't have to do too much of the regexp stuff that John usually does.
That's a part of the quickedit definition. How else would the quickedit end itself?
I think she means the specific > marker, that separates itself into its own paragraph already. The rest have to end on one carriage return so you can use them inline. But if the single return didn't end the >ing, then it would
do nothing at all, like the
one
I'm
using
after
every
word
in
this
sentence.
the one I'm using after every word in this sentence.
It made sense
when
I
typed
it.
But if the single return didn't end the >ing, then it would do nothing at all
Exactly. That's what the
t br
tag is for.
Top 20 of 20 Total Search Strings
#
Hits
Search String
1
24
29.27%
firefly spoilers
2
18
21.95%
buffistas.org
3
15
18.29%
buffistas
4
4
4.88%
buffista
5
4
4.88%
firefly quotes
6
2
2.44%
firefly and spoilers
7
2
2.44%
firefly episodes
8
1
1.22%
angel spoilers
9
1
1.22%
buffista board
10
1
1.22%
buffy messages
11
1
1.22%
buffy the vampire slayer wardrobes
12
1
1.22%
firefly fan fiction
13
1
1.22%
firefly slash
14
1
1.22%
firefly slash fic
15
1
1.22%
phoenix board buffista
16
1
1.22%
phoenix board buffy
17
1
1.22%
raunchy mature
18
1
1.22%
the phoenix board buffy
19
1
1.22%
who whating
20
1
1.22%
xander slash fanfiction pairings
I think it's hilarious that Firefly is such a draw.
I'm curious how far down the list we are for "ranchy mature" (I'm not going to bring that search up at work), and what the searcher thought when he or she finally got here.
I think it's hilarious that Firefly is such a draw.
It might be more that there are fewer websites for Firefly than for Buffy or Angel. i.e.: Someone does a search for "Angel spoilers" they get 72,000 hits and we're not even top 50. If they search for Firefly spoilers, there's "only" 2,500 hits, and we're top 10 (whoa! how did
that
happen?)
I'm curious how far down the list we are for "ranchy mature"
on google: #52 of 21,000.