Back on the warning graphic front... After a better review of the discussion and several failed attempts to make anything with a Doc Martin in it look anything but funny, it came back to this, for me.

Cutesy of any kind didn't seem to match up with the proposed use.

eta: Oops, messed up the URL, it is all better, now.

(never mind)

You need to replace the dot after images with a slash.

Jon, how do you see that being displayed? Left justified in the posting space?

Left justified in the posting space?

That's what I was thinking. Though I still like the round one or the one with the footprint.

Should it say warning? Coming late to the party here, so you can shoot me if you want, but aren't warnings what we do prior to banning? I'd hate someone to think they were about to be banned because they put a spoiler in the wrong place.

The round one was fine, as is the new one. I didn't like the anatomically correct footprint.

but aren't warnings what we do prior to banning?

IIRC, that's exactly what the image is for. Not every warning from a stompy (like misplacing a spoiler) is an Official Stompy Warning.

What Jon said. It was so someone couldn't come back and say "Well I didn't know it was an official warning."

Oh, thanks. I had a feeling I was missing something.