Angel ,'Conviction (1)'
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Yes, but that's already an option now, and apparently it's not enough, judging from the petitions for MARCIE.
What I meant wouldn't take bandwidth at all, because they would be relative links: in HTML, the t A NAME links just take you to another point in the page that you have already downloaded.
Oh, I get it! Yes. I didn't understand, I thought you had meant loading a new page.
God, this cold medicine is the good shit....
ita! You rocking goddess you!
Question... how much of a drain on resources is threadsuck? More or less than regular page views?
Are there optimal settings we should have so as not to make it go kerblewy again?
Could someone threadsuck then archive, maybe in batches of 1000 posts in an html format, the closed threads?
Has WX been closed again?
Not the main forum, but everything else.
And I'm working on prepping the infrastructure for the removal of mucho posts.
Daniel, when I hit that link it gave me your WX identity. You might want to go back in and take out the text between the @@ signs so it won't do that anymore.
ita, big love.
Basically, it's a HTML link, taking you right to the next post. I think it could be a middle ground between the current setup and a full-fledged MARCIE, which some might consider too agressive.
Depending on how tall your browser window is, and where the post falls on the page, it may not do anything for you. For example, in my browser window right now, when I'm scrolled to the bottom, I see the last five posts. If an annoying post was the fifth-to-last post on a page, clicking skip wouldn't take me any further down the page since I'm already at the end.
t edit and smooches to ita.
Natter 8 doesn't appear to be locked anymore.