I don't know about you guys, but I've had it with super-strong little women who aren't me.

Buffy ,'Get It Done'


Buffistas Building a Better Board  

Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.

To-do list


§ ita § - Dec 21, 2002 8:13:39 pm PST #2213 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Speaking of requests -- there have been a couple requests to change the behaviour of the thread links on the RH column -- which take you only the last post of the thread in question.

I'd like to throw this up for some more feedback. I never want to read the last userpagelimit - 1 posts, and always scroll straight to the bottom every time I click on a link with no new posts. So, selfishly, I'm very happy that these don't make me have to do that.

I'd been assuming that since no one mentioned it until just a while ago, that it was accepted behaviour.

Is this true, or wishful thinking?


Elena - Dec 21, 2002 8:41:34 pm PST #2214 of 10000
Thanks for all the fish.

If I want to find a specific post in a thread with no new posts I'll scroll back. Or, if I was smart, I'd bookmark it in the first place. Usually when I click on a thread with no new posts it's because I want to post something. It's easier to have just the last post on the page.


Sue - Dec 21, 2002 9:44:35 pm PST #2215 of 10000
hip deep in pie

I'm in agreement with what Elena said. Also, when I'm at home on my slow dial-up, and trying to catch-up in Natter by having my posts-per-page limit set at 100, it is quite annoying to have to wait for a page of one hundred already read posts to load.


Jon B. - Dec 21, 2002 9:58:13 pm PST #2216 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

I like having the context of the last bunch of posts, rather than just the last one.

Whatever is decided, I think it should be consistent between the main threads and the ones on the right side.


billytea - Dec 21, 2002 10:57:45 pm PST #2217 of 10000
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.

I like having the context of the last bunch of posts, rather than just the last one.

I lean this way too, though it doesn't cause me much distress. Consistency is a worthwhile goal regardless.


Michele T. - Dec 21, 2002 11:50:31 pm PST #2218 of 10000
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi

Whatever is decided, I think it should be consistent between the main threads and the ones on the right side.

Absolutely.


Jon B. - Dec 22, 2002 12:15:27 am PST #2219 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

I'm comfortable having my last name used, actually

Would you rather I put your last name back in? It'll take me less than a minute to change it back.


Michele T. - Dec 22, 2002 12:27:55 am PST #2220 of 10000
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi

Nah, don't bother.


Am-Chau Yarkona - Dec 22, 2002 2:42:32 am PST #2221 of 10000
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty

I'm definatly for consistent, and I'm with Elena. My connection being slow may affect that more than what I do, but if all threads with no unread posts only showed the last post, I could leave my posts-per-page at 200 or whatever and wouldn't be forever changing it.


Rob - Dec 22, 2002 6:00:37 pm PST #2222 of 10000

Another thing to add to the to-do list; adding a mode for folks with impaired vision. Looks pretty easy to do.

Griffyn "Firefly 2: You Can't Take the Sky From Me." Dec 22, 2002 7:56:07 pm EST