I suspect slash (and porn and ita) have little semantic value, what with the omnipresence and stuff.
And 'ita' won't even register, because it's too short.
Old trusty soda machine. I push you for root beer, you give me Coke.
Willow ,'End of Days'
Buffistas Building a Better Board
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
DXMachina - Dec 06, 2002 9:30:19 pm PST #1894 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Beverly - Dec 07, 2002 10:46:29 am PST #1895 of 10000
Days shrink and grow cold, sunlight through leaves is my song. Winter is long.
PF Stompy Foot? Really stinky troll in Buffy American Style, NAFDA equivalent. Stomp, stomp, stomp! Do the dance of squishy trolls!
§ ita § - Dec 07, 2002 12:49:58 pm PST #1896 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Pfah.
Going through and checking changes, I've realized that since we allow tags ( t i t u t b ) in taglines, the same fscking can happen there that can happen in posts. Which means that we need to roll the same function against tags as we do posts, which means it's no longer a method of posts, but a generic helper function.
FYI.
John H - Dec 07, 2002 1:29:47 pm PST #1897 of 10000
it's no longer a method of posts, but a generic helper function.
Does that raise the idea of making QuickEdit available in the tagline box as well, or is that just more trouble and work? Just a thought.
§ ita § - Dec 07, 2002 1:31:28 pm PST #1898 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I'd rather take out the tag-ability and put quickedit in. Limited quickedit, though.
Or we could just not have HTML in tags. I'm good with that too.
§ ita § - Dec 07, 2002 1:41:00 pm PST #1899 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Hokay. Implemented some of Jon's changes -- you are now informed (via a server-side count) that your tag has been amputated. Also put in the screen so one can change the number of posts displayed.
bon bon - Dec 07, 2002 1:43:58 pm PST #1900 of 10000
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
Oooh, spanks!
Jessica - Dec 07, 2002 1:57:33 pm PST #1901 of 10000
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
ita, since we're worried about bandwidth issues, which is preferable -- more posts/page or fewer?
John H - Dec 07, 2002 2:09:56 pm PST #1902 of 10000
It won't make any difference to the bandwidth if you read 100 posts in ten lots of ten or five lots of twenty -- it'll just make the pages larger for your browser.
brenda m - Dec 07, 2002 2:11:45 pm PST #1903 of 10000
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
Really? I would have thought that 10 separate hits would require more. But I know nothing about this.