Fay is the only ficcer on the list.
I've posted a lot of fic, and it hasn't driven my average up by that much.
Do we want archived (say, 3 month old or older since turn over) threads to be available as pages, or just as zipped archives?
'Objects In Space'
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Fay is the only ficcer on the list.
I've posted a lot of fic, and it hasn't driven my average up by that much.
Do we want archived (say, 3 month old or older since turn over) threads to be available as pages, or just as zipped archives?
Fay's wicked long of breath, and she tends to post one big catchup rather than lots of little ones, it seems.
I'm happy to code, but may be more trouble than I'm worth.. you want me to do what? hmm, never done that before.. searches online for solution.. gets back to you in a week.
Also happy to collect info. :)
Can we please move the posting competition, and analysis thereof, somewhere else?
t /stomp
It's like the tables belong here, but the discussion belongs in Natter. Maybe a crossposting next time.
Betsy made what I saw as a small mistake in a post, giving the following HTML:
<p>Your modem too slow? <a href='http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=300&e=17&u=/ibsys/20021108/lo_wisc/1382225">Try this.</a>
But that ' " mismatch broke the table layout, and made the edit function not work. I had to edit the database directly.
Guh. Another thing to fix. Is it something inherent in the tableosity of the pages?
I wondered what the frell was going on. I tried to edit that post, too, and it just sat there and ignored me.
Is it something inherent in the tableosity of the pages?
Gahh! Might be worth an effort to recreate the html of that errored page. Maybe if we look at it, we can figure out how to rejigger the page so it doesn't happen again.
Or recreate the error on the test site. We know what the text was that caused the error.
It seems at first glance that the problem is just that no links after that point on the page would work, or to put it another way, the whole of the rest of the page was included in the link, but I don't understand how that would break the Edit function, as it would have come before the error.