We're OK for money this year aren't we?
Jesse said we were sitting on surplus.
Plus bonus points for use of the word 'mosey'.
Oz ,'Same Time, Same Place'
Buffistas Building a Better Board
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
DavidS - Nov 08, 2002 11:33:42 pm PST #1305 of 10000
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
§ ita § - Nov 08, 2002 11:34:12 pm PST #1306 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Well, threads are being archived here, so that doesn't save much space.
Hmm. Further investigation shows we have only 32MB of tables.
And by only I mean "only", since we're babies yet.
I have to request telnet access so I can du the subdirectories. And I have to check if e-mail stored on the server counts to that total.
§ ita § - Nov 08, 2002 11:42:50 pm PST #1307 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Oh, and in October we had a bandwidth of 17.6 of 20GB allowed. So that's okay. Although the 2nd and the 25th were very low. If we redo the numbers with them at average bandwidth (.6GB), that brings us up to 19.6GB/month. Which is pretty close to the wire.
§ ita § - Nov 08, 2002 11:48:30 pm PST #1308 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
October usage:
DayHitsFilesPagesVisitsSitesKBytes%age KB 186,56846,8613,340944606721,6893.91% 28,9374,74234412315671,2870.39% 385,18747,1484,1011,092669700,7443.79% 481,82442,7333,019909614620,8303.36% 547,98423,0881,798625472333,9011.81% 657,89831,3742,170646513435,9912.36% 783,72747,1023,6501,085702732,3143.96% 889,17748,0663,930959609745,7044.04% 983,68046,9834,005986652722,2453.91% 1075,04741,2983,444881601626,2933.39% 1178,02742,3932,673827581628,1553.40% 1240,45822,3481,648525417289,3421.57% 1352,51728,1762,111605510394,0222.13% 1482,22546,7963,915935618732,2973.96% 1599,44854,3774,225959682827,5224.48% 1692,13153,9154,3061,027666801,6814.34% 1775,24343,4463,104870595640,8093.47% 1879,72044,7223,099816579677,0113.66% 1954,24626,1771,678583484376,5582.04% 2049,01224,9771,750625547344,0881.86% 2173,53740,7473,026811556598,7273.24% 2292,91151,0523,684937630781,7594.23% 23105,08458,9794,1861,063684870,2134.71% 2489,45149,4943,407849574732,8603.97% 253,7422,0241474911030,3450.16% 2660,38432,1642,065712542443,8622.40% 2767,94137,1152,432773536501,8322.72% 2892,06653,5493,8421,057664803,5644.35% 2988,51952,5984,060967605776,7224.20% 3094,75254,8903,836972618789,0044.27% 3181,71547,9183,707893562726,4903.93% TOTAL2,253,1581,247,25292,70225,10517,35418,477,861
John H - Nov 08, 2002 11:53:18 pm PST #1309 of 10000
So what's the penalty for going over the bandwidth?
§ ita § - Nov 08, 2002 11:54:50 pm PST #1310 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
They shut the site down, if I read the fora right.
Jon B. - Nov 09, 2002 12:29:40 am PST #1311 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
How comes the archiving notion?
I've got a threadsuck utility finished that's awaiting testing from ita (nudge, nudge ;) ).
Noumenon - Nov 09, 2002 12:32:11 am PST #1312 of 10000
No other candidate is asking the hard questions, like "Did geophysicists assassinate Jim Henson?" or "Why is there hydrogen in America's water supply?" --defective yeti
The threadsucker might break the bandwidth's back.
§ ita § - Nov 09, 2002 12:32:34 am PST #1313 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
In theory, that won't save any space unless we store the files off buffistas.org. I haven't run the numbers, but the HTML might very well be bigger than the data in the tables.
John H - Nov 09, 2002 12:33:51 am PST #1314 of 10000
The threadsucker might break the bandwidth's back.
Does the sucker work via hitting the server, or internally by grabbing stuff from the DB? If the latter, no bandwidth issues at all.
They shut the site down, if I read the fora right.
Don't they just charge us more? That seems wrong.