Plus, on Bones I'm sure that Bones had trouble reconciling what she would do for a year. I don't think that she could be idle for that long. I'm kind of surprised that didn't come up.
Mal ,'Serenity'
Natter Five-O: Book 'Em, Danno.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Bones: I also think she was faced with the fact that she really liked Sully, but she loved her work. She couldn't give up the work, because it's the majority of who she is.
I think I might almost like it better if we determine that Booth's hot for Bones, but Bones doesn't have the same feeling. (This may be purely selfish, because I want to see DB's woobie face.) I just can't help thinking of Moonlighting with this show.
I agree with connie about not keeping stupid secrets. Good good thing.
Holy ass! The guy who never e-mails me back actually e-mailed me back this afternoon!
It's like scattered showers of opposite day today.
re: Bones
I, for one, laughed like a loon at the face and the balloon. I suspect I am lacking in the finer feelings.
Holy ass! The guy who never e-mails me back actually e-mailed me back this afternoon!
At first, I read this like, "Holy ass," was his nickname, rather than just an exclamation of surprise.
awwww, so far, a lot of, "congrats! but you can't go! what will happen to us? please stay. we understand why, but we're so screwed."
It's nice to be loved.
awwww, so far, a lot of, "congrats! but you can't go! what will happen to us? please stay. we understand why, but we're so screwed."
So do you have something else lined up, or did you just reach your wits end with the current?
Also, good for you Allyson.
Go, Allyson!
Mr. Scola. I have a tech question for you. do you have IM at work?
awwww, so far, a lot of, "congrats! but you can't go! what will happen to us? please stay. we understand why, but we're so screwed."
I am JZ's complete lack of surprise.
I'm wondering - are there any "principled" conservative blogs? I.e. blogs that actually looks at facts instead of parroting whatever talking points are coming out of the Administration?
tommyrot, there are a few, though a problem they've found is that as soon as they say something critical of the Administration the rest of the conservablog world promptly excommunicates them. I'm fairly sure Andrew Sullivan still considers himself a principled conservative, but I'm not sure any other conservative pundits do.
And Glenn Greenwald, now with Salon, started out his (very wordy but oh so excellent) blog a couple of years ago as a very mildly conservative-leaning moderate with a strong interest in constitutional law and interpreting this Admin's actions through that lens, but it didn't take him long to get labeled a whackadoo moonbat because of his incomprehensible obsession with craxy leftist notions like facts and legislative and judicial precedent and such.