I love McDonnalds fries when they're hot and fresh, but too many times lately they've been cold and stale.
Bastards!
I fed off a flowerperson, and I spent the next six hours watchin' my hand move.
Spike ,'Same Time, Same Place'
Natter Five-O: Book 'Em, Danno.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
tommyrot - Mar 07, 2007 8:00:46 am PST #5551 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
§ ita § - Mar 07, 2007 8:02:08 am PST #5552 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
CNN needs spoiler warnings
It had one.
Editor's Note: The following story reveals information about the Marvel Comics' "Civil War" storyline and a key character. If you'd rather not know, stop reading now.
No biggie. Everyone slips.
Okay. Off to clean the kitchen.
bon bon - Mar 07, 2007 8:03:06 am PST #5553 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
Why? People in the 70's were weird.
I was a little young for this, so...wtf? People who wore bras by the 1970s, please advise.
ETA: my local morning news reported that story without any warning, so Marvel comics readers, go pick up your comics!
tommyrot - Mar 07, 2007 8:03:41 am PST #5554 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Why? People in the 70's were weird.
One of the comments:
After Dark was a New York City magazine targeted to gay men, covering nightlife, entertainment and culture. While it may have appeared in women's magazines at the time (I seem to remember seeing it in a few old ones), most likely in this case it was being marketed to drag queens.
OTOH, I've seen ads for bras with holes in them which allows for nippleage to still happen. Don't remember what era, though.
shrift - Mar 07, 2007 8:05:55 am PST #5555 of 10001
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty
But you're not thinking about fries any more, are you?
David Hewlett and Nathan Fillion should take me out for french fries and a chocolate shake!
Dana - Mar 07, 2007 8:06:05 am PST #5556 of 10001
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
F, C, M, Canadian Girls: Rachel Luttrell, Molly Parker, Jewel Staite.
Theodosia - Mar 07, 2007 8:06:44 am PST #5557 of 10001
'we all walk this earth feeling we are frauds. The trick is to be grateful and hope the caper doesn't end any time soon"
Cashmere, comments on the Flickr item seem to indicate the bra was probably marketed for drag queens.
Gudanov - Mar 07, 2007 8:07:19 am PST #5558 of 10001
Coding and Sleeping
It had one.
Oops, my bad.
bon bon - Mar 07, 2007 8:07:33 am PST #5559 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
If that bra was primarily intended for drag queens, it would have been available in sizes other than 32, 34 and 36.
§ ita § - Mar 07, 2007 8:07:52 am PST #5560 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I think the current aversion to nipples is weird too. If there were surgery around to make it so I didn't have to wear a bra (but didn't change the size of my breasts), I'd be saving my pennies for it. So my optimal state would have a nipple risk, and that's not something that bothers me.
However, the double nipple question is a very valid one.
I've seen ads for bras with holes in them which allows for nippleage to still happen.
I've seen those too, in the 70s. But they were always saucily advertised. They too assume that all nipples are both created and placed equally.