A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Post # 3571 in Un-Americans:
The whole entire Angel thread is full of echos.
Or possibly parrots.
They're definately undead anyhows--working on the ALIVE part.
I asked Zoe to clarify, because I didn't understand what she said. She went back and edited the post to include:
add: I'd probably speak more clearly if some will remove this (metaphorical) gag - Please.
So, she seems to think she's been gagged, but she STILL will not explain things she's posted recently that folks have asked for clarification on, nor has she joined the discussion here. That says "doesn't care about the community" to me.
(edit - xpost w/ ita)
Sorry ita, I thought the proposal was supposed to be posted in Light Bulbs before we could discuss it. Since that is not the case, never mind my silly question.
I thought the proposal was supposed to be posted in Light Bulbs before we could discuss it. Since that is not the case, never mind my silly question
But it has been -- that's certainly the way I thought it should work.
Perkins, I had the same thing--couldn't get to Buffistas at all for a few minutes.
I've got tons of thoughts on the Zoe thing, but if I get going on them now, I won't make any progress on my novel today. If it's still being discussed in a day or two, I'll weigh in. All I'll say for now is I'm definitely at the end of my personal tether where she's concerned, but hate the idea of suspending someone without a really clear smoking gun, because I don't like the precedent it would set. So color me conflicted.
I consider those cruel, hateful, vile things to do, and I agree they should ellicit a warning, whoever has posted them.
Standing. Right. Here.
I am the person who posted it. What's with the indirect communication? You want there should be a warning, to me?
But it has been -- that's certainly the way I thought it should work.
Now it has, but before (when I posted earlier) the last thing in there was from 3/27 - I hit refresh but it still didn't come up.
Like Sartre, only longer
This, or "No Exit" gets my vote.
I like "Like Sartre, Only Longer." Parallelism amuses me.
Just a suggestion: We have a proposal before the board in Lightbulb. Why don't we all step away from the Zoe discussion until that point is settled. Once we have a procedure in place, those who feel like she needs a formal warning can come back to Bureaucracy and try to muster the "X" number of votes if they so desire.
I'm NOT trying to censor anyone or stop the flow of discussion/ideas or the expression of opinions. Feel free to take or ignore this situation as you wish. It just seems that we could all use a break from the situation. And now we have something else fun to haggle over in Lightbulb.
