Good stuff, Laura and Nutty. I think for an Official Warning, the balance to draw is not between serious and funny, but between serious about the consequences and genuinely hopeful that the person will clean up his or her act.
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Stupid question for my clarification: Why are there different profiles for Zoe Ann and Zoe Finch? In my experience, on a board like this, someone with two profiles is either A) In Charge, or B) Up To No Good. Although with them being so similar, it could just be another example of cluelessness.
She reregistered with a different name at some point due to password difficulties, and wanted to stay with her new name.
She forgot her password to the Zoe Finch account, and reregistered as Zoe Ann.
Ah. So, general cluelessness. OK.
In my experience, on a board like this, someone with two profiles is either A) In Charge, or B) Up To No Good.
Bitterchick has two logins, and as far as I know, she's neither. I mean, I agree allowing multiple logins has been a problem for other fora, but we seem to tolerate it and it's never been an issue thus far.
Actually, quite a few people have two logins, mostly for Sang Sacre purposes. It's neither against any policy nor a big deal.
Actually, quite a few people have two logins, mostly for Sang Sacre purposes.
Ah. My bad.
I do think there's a difference between a second login a known poster uses for specific purposes (e.g., Sang Sacre, if someone wanted to keep her posts about fic under the name she wrote with) and someone using a second login to wreak havoc in some way. But the havoc-wreaking thing would probably fall under our rudeness/demon-y behvaior clause anyhow.
Scrappy also has an at-work login because of password issues.
But the havoc-wreaking thing would probably fall under our rudeness/demon-y behvaior clause anyhow.
Right. (And in that hypothetical case, I assume all a person's ids would be disabled.)