What ita and Ple were saying is that there is no standarized wording for a warning at all.
At least that's how I understood it.
Mal: There's plenty orders of mine that she didn't obey. Wash: Name one! Mal: She married you!
'War Stories'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
askye - Apr 14, 2003 8:11:42 am PDT #9669 of 10001
Thrive to spite them
§ ita § - Apr 14, 2003 8:13:39 am PDT #9670 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
What I sent Zoe wasn't a warning. Some of the delay in my sending it was because I didn't know what to write. I made some stuff up, but really, I thought that was what Cindy was composing. Since her text said nothing about the meaning of the warning, and that another warning would result in suspension.
Cindy - Apr 14, 2003 8:14:19 am PDT #9671 of 10001
Nobody
kewpie doll for ita
Thanks ita, that is what I was doing.
P.M. Marc - Apr 14, 2003 8:15:50 am PDT #9672 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
What ita and Ple were saying is that there is no standarized wording for a warning at all.
Basically. Boilerplate warning text, she would be helpful. ita hasn't the bandwidth, I suck at drafting such things, and I don't know about the rest of the stompies, but there is probably a combo pack of the above.
I don't think it has to be, or even should be clever (though the clever ones were lovely), because it needs to be clear, concise, and serious over anything else.
Lyra Jane - Apr 14, 2003 8:17:09 am PDT #9673 of 10001
Up with the sun
It seems to me that when we're at the point of a note from a stompy, the poster in question has probably already heard 500 times from other posters that they're being annoying and, really, please, stop being annoying. The Stompy note should come across as being stronger than that.
I can see both sides on calling it the warning or calling it a pre-warning.
Jessica - Apr 14, 2003 8:19:26 am PDT #9674 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
Quick aside -- should BitTorrent be in the FAQ? I know it's a tricky topic because of the legality issues, but it is pretty frequently asked about.
askye - Apr 14, 2003 8:20:39 am PDT #9675 of 10001
Thrive to spite them
Are we getting away from warning/suspension/banning?
I'm confused. Do we want the only thing from the admins to be the official warning of "don't do this anymore or you'll be suspended." (only you know more polite).
Or are we going to a system of "hey! stop, you have one more chance or then you'll be warned again. After that you'll be suspended."
P.M. Marc - Apr 14, 2003 8:22:43 am PDT #9676 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
Quick aside -- should BitTorrent be in the FAQ? I know it's a tricky topic because of the legality issues, but it is pretty frequently asked about.
Probably not, for the legality issues and what not.
Hil R. - Apr 14, 2003 8:23:52 am PDT #9677 of 10001
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l
I prefer sticking with the warning/suspension/banning system we have, at least until there's a really compelling reason to change it. By the time it gets to a warning, the person has been told in-thread many times to cool it. It's not like it's out of the blue.
amych - Apr 14, 2003 8:24:48 am PDT #9678 of 10001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
No, actually, it wouldn't.
Uh, what I was saying was that big policy changes might call for a vote, but administrative stuff like this doesn't. I think we're on the same side.