Hmm just how far does the lack of ridicule go?
For example if someone admired Henry Kissingers and his politics would it be unacceptable to say "Henry Kissinger is a war criminal"?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Hmm just how far does the lack of ridicule go?
For example if someone admired Henry Kissingers and his politics would it be unacceptable to say "Henry Kissinger is a war criminal"?
I don't think that would be unacceptable. I *would* find, "Henry Kissinger is a war criminal, you moron, and if you really knew what you were talking about, you'd feel differently," an unacceptable thing to say.
In the former, you're simply expressing your opinion, which happens to be different from someone else's. In the latter, you're denigrating a person for what they believe and insinuating that they're simply ignorant.
Either way--only three of us expressed interest, so I think it's dead in the water.
I'm going to go out on a limb and state that when *I* post about "ignoring disturbing political talk", it's almost always out of concern that things are getting too heated. YIDPTMV
I'm going to go out on a limb and state that when *I* post about "ignoring disturbing political talk", it's almost always out of concern that things are getting too heated. YIDPTMV
Yeah. Or if it's detoured into Nixon/Kissinger slash.
Aaaarrggh! My eyes!
Yeah. Or if it's detoured into Nixon/Kissinger slash.
Don't we have a policy of no real person slash, 'cause that would take of it, right?
I'd imagine we could walk the line between "Henry Kissinger is a war criminal" and " YOU are a war criminal".