If there's a place to discuss the war (Natter) then why create another?
'Time Bomb'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
And the old system wasn't subject to the moratorium
Right, but we are discussing grandfathering moratoriums over for recent decisions arrived at under consensus. That's a procedural and transitional issue that probably needs to be addressed, and would (possibly) resolve the war thread vote or any other revisiting vote issues.
Cindy. I can't. I have a good memory for black words on white. I can see the post, but I don't know how to nilly without the search function.
If you want, I can go back through bureacracy and find it... which should delay things until sometime next week. *g*.
I think it was even Victor who said it first, if that's any help to anyone who can find it.
You can threadsuck and then control-F to search, FYI.
oh, duh, okay, I'll find it.
I think it was over on WX. I can go try and look.
But the proposal on whether the time limit applies to previous decisions got seconded first, and it logically should be decided first.
Look the second proposal was moved in response to my proposal. And moots the first proposal. (x-post with DavidS) So if the consensus is to let it move ahead I'm not going to fight it. But I do want to point out there are meritorious arguments why the first proposal should be before the second proposal. I'm just not going to make them in an effort to decrease the fighting. (Feel free to email me if you're really dying to hear them.)
you do that Sophia, I'll do this... I think it was here, too.
I can't even remember what the first and second proposals were at this point, it would help to use specifics.