'Shindig'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Yeah, back to what I was talking about...
Can we, as somebody said, move COMM "above the fold"?
I love my COMM, and I no want to scroll.
And I still think my proposed rearrangement was BRILLIANT (and hot!) but it's okay, I can let it go. I'm cool. Like Fonzie. And, for that matter, Fozzie Bear.
Am I the only one who thinks reasonableness should be a necessary factor here?
What exactly are you finding unreasonable?
Is anybody going to stand up and say "COMM doesn't belong above the fold?" Stand up now, please.
it DOES belong above the fold! It does!
although "decided" needs to be defined.)
Exactly. Buffista A points "I said no blah thread" two months ago, nobody said anything else pro or con, so there was a consensus against blah. Nobody can propose blah for (3 or 6) months.
COMM is fine over the fold. In fact, I think it is a BBB issue.
Am I the only one who thinks reasonableness should be a necessary factor here?
I'd really like you to take my battlescarred word for it that the most reasonable thing is for us to be able to limit the discussions in both scope and time. Historically the fallout from overtalking has tended to be more significant than the actual issue under debate.
COMM could be its own category and put at the top. Or just under Beep Me and Press.
What david said.
Buffista A points "I said no blah thread" two months ago, nobody said anything else pro or con, so there was a consensus against blah.
I don't believe this ever happened. We don't tend toward silence. You may have noticed. I am quite confident that I could post "Green peas are yummy" in Natter and there'd wind up being a debate.