Thanks, Nutty. I still vote "Lightbulb". Whip Appeal
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Okay! Look! It's a completely unfair ten-minute consensus on lightbulbs! We got anyone around who can make a topic?
OK-- and this thread is only onpen to discuss proposals, right?
Also, as much as I care not to discuss it, I think we probably do have to do a war discussion thread vote IF we get a fourth.
If we allow the war decision to be overturned because it doesn't fit the new rules, then does that mean that every other previous decision can be revoted?
If we allow the war decision to be overturned because it doesn't fit the new rules, then does that mean that every other previous decision can be revoted?
Why don't we take it on a decision by decision basis. I don't think we need to make a sweeping policy on this right now.
ETA: And there was no war "decision". ;)
I'm with Betsy. I absolutely do not have the strength to revisit every old issue because we now have new voting rules in place.
Okay, folks, where's the list of Stompies? Is it in the FAQ?
Oooh, so we can get rid of the Movies thread now? (kidding)
Seriously, just because you don't like the decision doesn't mean it wasn't decided.
I only think we do becuase it is fuzzy whether this is a NEW proposal because the circumstances changed, or a revisiting of an old proposal. Also, we haven't voted in a time period for closed discussion, so it is unclear that way to.
What I do think is we need to decide this time period before we decide anything else, so we need to wait a while to do that anyway.
Seriously, just because you don't like the decision doesn't mean it wasn't decided.
And just because you agree with the alleged decision doesn't make it a decision.