Dream Girl ,'Bring On The Night'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
ridiculously extreme numbers
I think if we get one voter who puts in "a million" then yeah, we can safely call that a Spoiled Ballot without becoming evil dictators.
What do you think of wording it that way though: "buffistas have suggested numbers between x and y, but please put in whatever you think"?
I like having the preset limits, otherwise someone's got to decide where to draw the line on what's extreme. It makes more sense than saying "if we decide whatever you think is extreme, we'll reject it after the fact."
What do you think of wording it that way though: "buffistas have suggested numbers between x and y, but please put in whatever you think"?
I think the point/counterpoint posts of Sophia and Liese would do a better job of explaining what the implications were for each choice. What a high number for MVT would do, what a low number for Seconds could do.
The effect is kind of the same - trying to give quick information that encapsulates longer discussion, but putting it on the ballot that way is sort of prescriptive, whereas reading the positions would allow more room for considering it.
I haven't heard anyone proposing anything higher than 65.
Actually, I more than halfway meant it when I posted 97. The post was a late-night, not worded so as to be taken seriously, but I favor a very high MVT.
And I don't like the idea of "pick a number between 2 and 100, suggestions range from 10 to 65" -- it really seems designed to skew votes toward the midrange.
Edit: I should specify that I mean we should either pick 2-100 or 10-65, not that I want no upper and lower limits at all.
I'd also like to point out that asking for Buffistas to pick a number for MVT seems very likely in getting a different number in the box for every vote turned in.
What would we do then?
What would we do then?
Some form of average -- both mean and median have been discussed.
I mean we should either pick 2-100 or 10-65, not that I want no upper and lower limits at all.
That's what I was proposing.
I meant "take out the 2-100, put in the other buffista-suggestion numbers".
Some form of average
I recall Jon B posting that he'd be shocked if we did anything other than the mean.
What Ple proposed it using the "median" to check ourselves on the "mean". That is, if they are very different, I think there is a high or low number really skewing.
What Ple proposed it using the "median" to check ourselves on the "mean". That is, if they are very different, I think there is a high or low number really skewing.
Yerp.
Okay, just making sure I was following. I'll return to my lurking now.