On item 3: How will rounding be handled? If the mean ends up 22, will we round down to 20, but if it is 23 will we round up to 25?
That's what I had assumed.
Saffron ,'Our Mrs. Reynolds'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
On item 3: How will rounding be handled? If the mean ends up 22, will we round down to 20, but if it is 23 will we round up to 25?
That's what I had assumed.
I predict that the final number will be somewhere between 15 and 40.
Me too.
Why are we rounding?
eta -
I could understand the "5" thing if instead of saying "pick any number in the range" we were going to offer choices of
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50... 100
But what's the sense of rounding to the nearest 5?
John (or maybe Jon) suggested rounding when he first made the proposal because we didn't want to have the number "23.84365" be the number of buffistas needed.
we didn't want to have the number "23.84365" be the number of buffistas needed.
Understood, but then why round to the nearest 5 instead of the nearest unit?
Right - that's what I meant. Why not round to the nearest whole number?
That I do not know. I think whoever it was just thought it would be odd even to have 23 be the number.
I am not speaking for myself, though, so I don't really know.
I like rounding to the nearest unit. It'll be fun to have the number be 23. Or whatever.
John H "Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier" Mar 11, 2003 10:02:27 pm EST
This was the original post. I think discussion is on either side.
Back at #7289, John H said:
Hate me for asking, but what's a Binary Walk?
Did we ever get a (serious) answer for this? If so, I missed it. A link that explains it or a email to profile addy would be fine so as not to over-mathify the list. I'm just curious. Googling turned up lots of explanations of walks through a binary tree, but I'm not sure if that is related.
On rounding, I'm with the nearest integer crowd.