Let's get something on the table and vote on it, in a desperate attempt to get this over with. Let's stop being academic and "what-if", and do it already.
pumps fist!
Xander ,'Lessons'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Let's get something on the table and vote on it, in a desperate attempt to get this over with. Let's stop being academic and "what-if", and do it already.
pumps fist!
Just Do It
Post #7181 wording works for me.
Link
John H "Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier" Mar 11, 2003 11:03:24 pm EST
Good, yes, I like that too, and many thanks to Sophia and John H for trying to soldier through the statistical fray, purpose intact.
Laura nominates, I second; are we for it? Can we write this proposal on stone tablets and set voting for, um, soon?
Good, yes, I like that too, and many thanks to Sophia and John H for trying to soldier through the statistical fray, purpose intact.
What Nutty said. [Edit: I mean, seconded-ed, if that's needed]
Good, yes, I like that too, and many thanks to Sophia and John H for trying to soldier through the statistical fray, purpose intact.
Yes. Ditto.
if so, is there a minimum number of people who have to agree before a proposal moves to formal discussion? Put a number between 1 and 10 into this box, please: [ ]
One nitpick - We need to be clear that this number excludes the person who makes the proposal. i.e. a "1" means one person proposes and one other person seconds.
Couple of thoughts after reading the overnights --
I'm not sure why participants here have been dismissed as a "Gang of 14." Everyone has the opportunity to participate. Bureaucracy is a sidebar thread -- we all have access to it, whether we actively subscribe or not. It doesn't seem fair to criticize the process just because a relatively small number choose to participate (or, flipping it around, because most people choose not to participate).
If most people don't know what's going on here, followers of this thread should get the word out that here is where board governance matters are discussed and narrowed down for the ballot. (I'd be happy to post something in Press, or draft something for the FAQs, if people want.)
I like the idea of "pick a number" for quorum, if only to avoid the "preferential vs. runoff" question for now. Thought for the future -- include an "present" option in future votes. "Present" would mean, "I'd like to see a decision, but it doesn't matter which. So count me toward a quorum."
"Median" means "strip of grass in the middle of the road" so you just pick the most boring number.
No, a strip of grass in the middle of the road is a "neutral ground." t /New Orleaniana :)
Yes Jon, I was about to say that.
I have gathered the impression that 'the median' in English parlance is 'the central reservation.'
I really like the idea that a high number of seconds must be garnered to move a resolution into voting.
Oh, and if nobody else volunteers, I can tally again (with the same schedule problem of being away from a computer on most of Friday-Saturday).