knocks tentatively on door

Hello? I must admit that I'm not following the intricacies of the present bureaucratic debate - I don't have strong feelings about the red tape of it all either way and I don't feel confident that I can predict what kind of things are liable to crop up that need addressing. I apologise to any and all people who find this attitude infuriating - I do appreciate that this voting thing is something many people feel strongly about, but my online time is very limited right now & I'm trusting that we'll all continue to treat one another with respect and affection, and that as and when particular issues crop up, we'll be able to work things out together.

t /Pollyanna-with-Masterpiece-Theatre-accent

Anyway, just nipped in to ask a slightly random question: for some reason there seems to be some weirdness going on with the way my screen shows people's tags at present. It's not a big issue, but I just thought I'd mention it in case anyone else was having the same thing? But it may well be a my-end problem, rather than a board-related problem.

We return you to your regularly-scheduled debate.

vanishes in puff of pink smoke

John- WX is down, but I did a post with Allyson's original proposal. It mostly came up on WX because of people feeling that they shouldn't even come in Bureacracy because us loudmouths shot them down. And David or I or Jesse semi-suggested just talking about how we make decisions, and Betsy said she thought that decisions should be closed for a period of time after a decision was made, so we didn't keep having talks and the Allyson said this:

kay, so. We have a Bureaucracy thread to deal with administratriva.

Why not a So It Is Written, So It Shall Be thread for community decisions?

Ex: Bill Buffista wants an asspicking thread. Betty, Brooke,and Bob Buffista all think that's a great idea.

Joanie, Jackie, and Julie Buffista think that idea sucks.

So, Stompy says, "We will open discussion on Asspicking Thread, now. The discussion will last for one week, and end on March 3rd, 8PM GMT, in the Supreme Court thread.

At that point, people can philibuster til their heart's content, until March 3rd, when a Mr.Poll announcement is made, and people can vote for another week. Votes are tallied and the decision is posted.

The discussion here started here:

Sophia Brooks "Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier" Feb 24, 2003 8:46:55 am EST

You're allowed to come visit here whenever you like, Fay. ;)

there seems to be some weirdness going on with the way my screen shows people's tags at present.

You'll need to be more specific. Also, this is more appropriate for the BBaBB thread.

Now get outta here!

Thanks Sophia, you're indispensible as always.

And

WX is down

there's a reminder why this place matters so much to us.

Cheers, Jon!

I'll hold off on the BBaBB thing, though, because it seems to have straightened itself out...

Voting starts Tuesday night (March 4, 2003) at midnight and closes Friday night (Mar. 7, 2003) at midnight (that would be "Board Time", i.e. EST)

I'm sorry, but I just encountered a problem I hadn't anticipated when volunteering to tally this ballot: I can't be here on most of the (USA) Friday and Saturday (the Jewish day of sabbath, Israel time). The earliest possible time I can post the total vote count is Saturday night (USA time). Obviously, I don't mind doing that, but I figured most of you would like to know the results as fast as possible, so an around 24-hours delay is not of the good. My apologies, and any better solutions are highly welcome.

BTW, 90 people have voted so far.

You mean you have a life outside of here Nilly, and a faith other than the cult of the Buffistas?

Burn the heretic!

BTW, 90 people have voted so far.

That's good news. I was worried too many people would be turned off.

Personally, I don't mind if results are delayed a day.

In fact, the longer the voting period, the longer it will be quiet in here...

Nilly, how about a year's holiday in England?