Does "plurality" mean "the option with most votes"?
'Out Of Gas'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
"Plurality -- the largest number of votes, whether or not that number exceeds 50%. For instance, if the votes are split 35%-33%-32%, the 35% number would win."
Edit at will.
Yes. I'll put that in.
Okay. I propose a vote.
If you want me to, I'm here to tally.
I second ita's proposal with suggested edits.
I'm pro-ita's proposal.
also pro ita's proposal
I'm with Betsy and Jim. I'm worried that this endless hairsplitting is damaging people's enjoyment of the board, and causing more strife than it aimed to fix. I'd like to see some voting process in place, but I don't think it has to be this complicated.
I've tried to stay involved in the process, but I haven't read that last 300 posts or so, because it's making me a little crazy. I'm now okay with letting everyone else tire themselves out chasing their own tail.
I'll go with that, as it's clearly something that needs to be decided.
Ok, a proposal has been made and seconded and thirded and, I think, fourthed. And I'll fifth it.
So now if this really is an attempt at a democracy, a vote should happen on this issue right now. Whomever sets it up, set it up and let's go.
We can discuss ad nauseum, but there should be no more discussion as to IF this vote should happen, because it has been proposed and seconded.