'Life of the Party'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I think we still need to include a write-in option for the Quorum and Second votes so everyone's opinion gets represented fairly.
I think we need to decide now, by consensus, what the range of choices should be. I'm trying to prevent multiple votes. I've suggested a range of numbers for each question. If anyone thinks that there should be more specific choices, then voice your opinion.
I think a few people like the "10" for a "second"
So 0 to 10 (eleven choices) for seconds?
So 0 to 10 (eleven choices) for seconds?
0,3,5,10? I don't think we need to include every number in the range.
I don't think we need to include every number in the range.
I know, I know. Maybe 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 as a compromise?
Also, we need to let people know whether the number is inclusive of the proposer. (I think it is pretty obvious, but...)
I think just seven choices-0,1,2,3,4,5,10.
I just want to be sure that out of 100 voters, if 25 want 2 Seconds, and 20 want 3 Seconds and 20 want 4 Seconds and 35 want 10 Seconds, the 35 don't win it. That's very disparate and unfair.
That's very disparate and unfair.
Wolfram - That's why I'm proposing a preferential ballot. Your problem goes away under that method.