No, that's totally cool! I thought it was totally cool! It was, like, honorable.
That's insane troll logic!
Xander ,'Showtime'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
jengod - Mar 02, 2003 10:39:37 pm PST #6154 of 10001
jengod - Mar 02, 2003 10:40:22 pm PST #6155 of 10001
The big jump on Saturday (300%) suggests that we make sure to have at least 1 of the voting days be a weekend day, for those who can't do it at work.
He's kidding, right?
§ ita § - Mar 02, 2003 10:40:56 pm PST #6156 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
He's kidding, right?
You might want to ask him, but why are you so convinced?
jengod - Mar 02, 2003 10:43:09 pm PST #6157 of 10001
Dost Gandalfe jest?
Because Saturday had *6* people. And if we're always wiggling around trying to grab a weekend day for voting we're going to get even more mired down.
Gandalfe - Mar 02, 2003 10:47:32 pm PST #6158 of 10001
The generation that could change the world is still looking for its car keys.
Kind of, but it could be a statistically significant point. Are those really people whose voices shouldn't be heard? We really want to ignore 6.6% of the populace? Are we going to be democratic, or only democratic when it's convenient?
Jon B. - Mar 02, 2003 10:49:46 pm PST #6159 of 10001
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
it could be a statistically significant point.
An increase from 2 to 6 is not statistically significant. t /pedantic actuary
§ ita § - Mar 02, 2003 10:50:32 pm PST #6160 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
</pedantic actuary>
There's another sort?
Gandalfe - Mar 02, 2003 10:51:04 pm PST #6161 of 10001
The generation that could change the world is still looking for its car keys.
If those were the only two points, it damn well would be. As an actuary, with this small a sample, would you consider 6.6% significant?
billytea - Mar 02, 2003 10:51:30 pm PST #6162 of 10001
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.
An increase from 2 to 6 is not statistically significant.
Strictly, that depends on what you're measuring. t /equally pedantic actuary
billytea - Mar 02, 2003 10:53:23 pm PST #6163 of 10001
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.
There's another sort?
Yup, an unemployed actuary.
If those were the only two points, it damn well would be. As an actuary, with this small a sample, would you consider 6.6% significant?
Without a reason to believe their voting pattern would differ significantly from the other votes cast, and with the votes decided by such significant margins, probably not.