Uh, are we gonna fight, or is there just gonna be a monster sarcasm rally?

Stoner Vamp ,'Lessons'


Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


Elena - Mar 01, 2003 1:07:23 am PST #6061 of 10001
Thanks for all the fish.

I've been Buff diving, and I notice that shrift has very neatly changed a certain name that used to start with 'A' to 'Jamie Stemple' very nice work.

Except in post of Reema's (that seems to be an Anya of Sleeper) which contains this line.

Jamie Stemple Mann: I'm Jamie Stemple Mann!

Which just kind of demonstrates the bloody-minded literalness of global replace. And made me laugh like a drain.


Angus G - Mar 01, 2003 5:35:46 am PST #6062 of 10001
Roguish Laird

Anyone who feels inclined to give up numberslutting, may I suggest you also consider giving up "What ___ said," "Edited to fix punctuation" (who cares?) and, indeed, "Wrod"?


Cindy - Mar 01, 2003 6:05:47 am PST #6063 of 10001
Nobody

"Edited to fix punctuation"

My experience from other communities is that people make note of their reason for editing, particularly in an argument more involved discussion, to prevent an issue from arising such as: Why did you edit. You called me a numberslut, didn't you, you editing ho?!?

Perhaps it is a bit silly, because you could lie in your reason for editing note, but I kind of like when I see it. Occasionally here, I see big discussions, then a few edited posts, and I hate the break in continuity or the appearance of it.


Sophia Brooks - Mar 01, 2003 6:21:06 am PST #6064 of 10001
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here

Might I suggest that regulating these things is how we become TvWOP, and start having the-- "Whoops, you vioolated some very specific rule on how to write your post--Now we will close the thread forever! MWAH-HA-HA-HA!"

Also, Hil had a good point about bringing it up when it is happening, like Betsy did with the swearing.

Next thing you know, we'll outlaw misspellings, and the Trudy and beth and I will be out on our butts!


Cindy - Mar 01, 2003 6:23:44 am PST #6065 of 10001
Nobody

Yey, end me two.


Angus G - Mar 01, 2003 6:29:33 am PST #6066 of 10001
Roguish Laird

No, I certainly don't want to regulate anything! Just bringing up very personal (and trivial) peeves. The "edited" thing? Well, I just assume if someone's actually made a substantive edit they'll say so. But in any case it's really not important.


Sophia Brooks - Mar 01, 2003 6:38:47 am PST #6067 of 10001
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here

Actually, Angus, I'm sorry if I implied that I thought you were serious! I figured we were on the same side!


Cindy - Mar 01, 2003 6:42:25 am PST #6068 of 10001
Nobody

I understood that Angus, I just felt convicted and explainy wanted to note that it's an internet custom of sorts, in more polite societies.


Angus G - Mar 01, 2003 6:43:52 am PST #6069 of 10001
Roguish Laird

That's cool, Sophia, I just wanted to make it extra clear that, while I certainly hope to shame and goad others into changing their behaviour, I don't want to force them. t grin


DavidS - Mar 01, 2003 8:34:07 am PST #6070 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

I don't mind if there's a little intra-cultural pressure to cut down on numberslutting, wrod-iness, or editorial notations. I brought up the whole "can I tag" thing because I thought it was superfluous. I didn't ask for a rule on it. Just tried to bend the culture a little bit around something that was a little bothersome to me. I certainly wouldn't mind if it was determined that it was uncool to numberslut, but I don't know if I could resist to grab a 10,000 either.