That is what I am thinking, too.
Of course, there are, like 7 of us here right now!
Should I post something in Press saying that we are talking?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
That is what I am thinking, too.
Of course, there are, like 7 of us here right now!
Should I post something in Press saying that we are talking?
I would suggest that a "Robert's Rules of Order" procedure be used to bring something up for discussion/voting. Let's say that someone suggests a Connor is HOTT! thread. If (arbitrary number) Buffistas say that they'd be interested, the topic moves on to discussion. Then, if after discussion, (arbitrary number) Buffistas are still interested in bringing it to a vote, it is brought up for a vote.
This sounds good to me.
I would suggest that a "Robert's Rules of Order" procedure be used to bring something up for discussion/voting. Let's say that someone suggests a Connor is HOTT! thread. If (arbitrary number) Buffistas say that they'd be interested, the topic moves on to discussion. Then, if after discussion, (arbitrary number) Buffistas are still interested in bringing it to a vote, it is brought up for a vote.
I like it.
We definitely should not consider anything decided until at least this time tomorrow, to give everyone a chance to weigh in.
If (arbitrary number) Buffistas say that they'd be interested, the topic moves on to discussion. Then, if after discussion, (arbitrary number) Buffistas are still interested in bringing it to a vote, it is brought up for a vote.
I would like to request that the (A.N.) be fairly small (say, 5), and that we always vote even if the conclusion is pretty much foregone. I think to do otherwise leaves us open to the charge that the people who talk loudest and last have made the choice.
For the ignorant among us, who is this Robert, and what are his Rules?
Roberts Rules are how formal commitee meetings are run.
Some on proposes, it is seconded and thirded, then the motion is put up for vote.
Some on proposes, it is seconded and thirded, then the motion is put up for vote.
Ah, gotcha.
And maybe a good idea to place a post in other threads, too, linking people to each Bureau post to be voted on. That way you get the attention of people who don't come in Bureau.
One of the reasons we created the Sunnydale Press thread was to have a one-stop place for announcements like this, so I'm strongly against cross-posting in other threads.
RE the voting mechanism: either a Yay/Nay subject line, or separate Yay/Nay email addresses would work well. However, for those whom the mailto link wouldn't work, it's probably better to go with separate email addresses since they are less likely to be misspelled.
Should we, as Sophia suggested, post in Press then, to the effect "It's Monday and we're talking about how Buffistas is run"?