What's the Beatles one?
Natter 9 ... Natter 9 ... Natter 9 ...
Or something like that.
Take jobs as they come -- and we'll never be under the heel of nobody ever again. No matter how long the arm of the Alliance might get, we'll just get ourselves a little further.
Mal ,'Out Of Gas'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Hil R. - Feb 18, 2003 10:26:48 pm PST #4804 of 10001
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l
Matt the Bruins fan - Feb 18, 2003 10:28:28 pm PST #4805 of 10001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
I'm having a Cletus the Slack-Jawed Yokel moment in completely not getting that as a Beatles reference. Though I have no objection to it as a thread title, and certainly have no suggestions of my own.
billytea - Feb 18, 2003 10:29:25 pm PST #4806 of 10001
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.
Natter 9 ... Natter 9 ... Natter 9 ... Or something like that.
Ah, ok.
Nah, I prefer the menagerie.
bon bon - Feb 18, 2003 10:32:17 pm PST #4807 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
Jon explained the ref here, Matt: Jon B "Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier" Feb 18, 2003 12:35:21 am EST
P.M. Marc - Feb 19, 2003 12:08:08 am PST #4808 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
So is Natter 9 the final answer?
msbelle - Feb 19, 2003 12:09:04 am PST #4809 of 10001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
natterless.
bon bon - Feb 19, 2003 12:09:22 am PST #4810 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
I think it's fairest, Plei.
§ ita § - Feb 19, 2003 12:10:09 am PST #4811 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Prince will get you all.
When you least expect it.
bon bon - Feb 19, 2003 12:10:50 am PST #4812 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
He's a lot like the rhythm that way.
candyb - Feb 19, 2003 6:47:25 am PST #4813 of 10001
Eventhough all the talk about rules and meta issues gets tedious it's better that we do it than not.
Though I don't natter, it really is the heart of the Buffistas now. And it's important to acknowledge that fact and change the definition paragraph in the "About this Site".
For various reasons, interest in and extreme love for the shows that originally brought us all together are dying.
The shows will eventually go away, more sooner than later, and then what? Most people who don't natter will wander off anyway. Personally, it will suck for me but I don't want to try and change the community and promote thread proliferation just because I can't natter, yet still want to be a Buffista.
If Buffista is to be all about natter, the the two big natter threads, the main one and Spike thread, are what will keep the community going.
And as Kat said, they must be tended to and protected. Everyone must be committed to it. Natter is what will last. I think that if thread proliferation hurts that, then hard decisions must be made.
We can't keep holding on to the good old days. And we can't go back or tell Joss not to post so new people don't show up. Everything changes. All we can do is move forward.