Seconded!
I'm fairly certain I said no interruptions.
Buffy ,'Potential'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Jen - Sep 18, 2002 11:49:23 am PDT #40 of 10001
love's a dream you enter though I shake and shake and shake you
DXMachina - Sep 18, 2002 11:50:04 am PDT #41 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
A nice, flame free place for poltical discussion
Is this even possible? ;-)
(edited to say that I have no objection. Nor do I have any interest, but that's just me.)
Gudanov - Sep 18, 2002 11:53:14 am PDT #42 of 10001
Coding and Sleeping
I think a new thread is a good idea. A political thread is bound to be a lot more heated than the natter thread usually is. Having it's own environment is probably a good idea.
Typo Boy - Sep 18, 2002 11:58:42 am PDT #43 of 10001
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.
edited to say that I have no objection. Nor do I have any interest, but that's just me.)
The having no interest is one good reason to support the new thread. Less politics in natter.
lori - Sep 18, 2002 11:59:33 am PDT #44 of 10001
I'm totally for having a separate political thread. Because then I can avoid it.
Typo Boy - Sep 18, 2002 12:01:10 pm PDT #45 of 10001
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.
Yup that's the point. Those who hate poltics can avoid it. Those who find politics of interest can hang out there. And if I end up there all by myself, we can always delete the thread. *g*
§ ita § - Sep 18, 2002 12:01:43 pm PDT #46 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
We need to be sure that threads are created because of sufficient interest of people who are going to participate, not because of people who don't read that content in another thread, since that way lies madness. We'd have a gazillion (cat, LotR, Hugh Dillon) threads in a heartbeat.
Jessica - Sep 18, 2002 12:02:35 pm PDT #47 of 10001
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?
We'd have a gazillion (cat, LotR, Hugh Dillon) threads in a heartbeat.
I've been meaning to ask -- where's the cat/LotR/Hugh Dillon-lovers thread? Huh?
Typo Boy - Sep 18, 2002 12:02:41 pm PDT #48 of 10001
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.
Hmm point. So who would be interested in a positive way in a politics thread?
Jen - Sep 18, 2002 12:08:36 pm PDT #49 of 10001
love's a dream you enter though I shake and shake and shake you
And if I end up there all by myself, we can always delete the thread.
You wouldn't end up there alone, on one general condition that has nothing specifically to do with you: that there's an established and enforced agree-to-disagree, we're-here-to-learn, no-one-will-be-belittled-for-believing-what-they-do policy.
I detest political missionaries as much I detest religious ones, and nothing pisses me off more than someone implying that I'm dumb, so if the thread turns into a you're-wrong-and-I'm-right-and-this-is-why-you're-a-moron-for-not-thinking-the-way-I-do, I'll be outta there faster than the IMF issues privatization orders.