Illyria: We cling to what is gone. Is there anything in this life but grief? Wesley: There's love. There's hope...for some. There's hope that you'll find something worthy...that your life will lead you to some joy...that after everything...you can still be surprised. Illyria: Is that enough? Is that enough to live on?

'Shells'


Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


Jen - Jan 02, 2003 12:57:40 pm PST #2196 of 10001
love's a dream you enter though I shake and shake and shake you

You misspelled "the thread has become inhospitable to actual discussion of the show because of the vocal nature of the 'this season sucks' crowd."

Yikes, I'm really sorry to hear that you feel that way. I don't watch the show anymore, so I don't read the thread and therefore won't be an impediment to discussion if I was before. I apologize if I contributed to an inhospitable environment.

Edit: A HoYayTV thread would be fine with me, although I suspect that Michele isn't the only person who may want to discuss more than the slashy subtext of Smallville.


Michele T. - Jan 02, 2003 12:57:48 pm PST #2197 of 10001
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi

It seems fair (on the one hand) - and yet it is also a kind of invitation to shit storms.

It really is an invitation of that sort. Allow the person to e-mail the stompies, and if the stompies think he or she has a point, they can open the discussion here.


Connie Neil - Jan 02, 2003 12:59:02 pm PST #2198 of 10001
brillig

I like the HoYay TV thread idea.

As for people who keep trying to change our minds about what we debated to death and resurrection and back to death again, I'm afraid I'm on the "If you have no new evidence to present, the sentence stands" train.

Damn, I've gotten legalistic in my old age.


David J. Schwartz - Jan 02, 2003 12:59:23 pm PST #2199 of 10001
New, fully poseable Author!Knut.

I vote 'Yes' on a Music thread, but like Hec I'm confused as to why it's controversial. For myself, I can't handle Natter. There's too much volume there, and I know there are discussions I'd like to be involved in there, but . . . By creating a Music thread no one is saying "Music should not be discussed in Natter," and no one is being forced to keep up with the Music thread. It's simply an ancillary discussion thread, which will probably not be one-tenth as active as Natter. IJS.


DavidS - Jan 02, 2003 1:00:21 pm PST #2200 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

The issue with Smallville is that it's sort of its own subcommunity at this point with its own history. Aside from the show.

But...it does have a very large crossover with Due South so a HoYay thread might be a good idea.


DavidS - Jan 02, 2003 1:01:44 pm PST #2201 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Allow the person to e-mail the stompies, and if the stompies think he or she has a point, they can open the discussion here.

This seems fair, and more importantly lets us control the discussion rather than handing the reins to somebody deemed worthy of a warning in the first place.


billytea - Jan 02, 2003 1:01:49 pm PST #2202 of 10001
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.

But in the future I'm wondering if we want to allow people who are being disciplined to defend themselves in Bureaucracy or have their say. It seems fair (on the one hand) - and yet it is also a kind of invitation to shit storms. I really don't know.

It's tough. If it was any sort of real-world example, then such proceedings would be conducted under particular standards of conduct. If we're discussing suspension or banning of a poster on the grounds that they don't adhere to such standards, it's kind of a Catch 22.

I would vote yes, I think, to giving them the opportunity to defend themselves, have their say, confront their accusers, all the rest of it. It's fair and all that, and it makes the decision-making more transparent. And because the whole decision-making process hasn't actually been formalised, I would suggest that if they do basically piss all over the proceedings, it would likely make the end decision that much easier and faster to reach.


meara - Jan 02, 2003 1:02:31 pm PST #2203 of 10001

I don't care if Smallville and DueSouth are combined--though there is the point of Smallville continuing to have new eps, whereas DS does not. Just a thought.

I'm also kinda against thread proliferation, and I suspect I won't at all read a music thread...but I'd say go for it. Seems like a buffista-y thing, to me.


David J. Schwartz - Jan 02, 2003 1:02:58 pm PST #2204 of 10001
New, fully poseable Author!Knut.

As for inviting folks over to discuss their warnings/suspensions . . . I'm as conflicted as Hec. I want to be fair, but there's fair and there's "Please join us for tea and shit-hurling." Not that m. wasn't fairly agreeable just now, but who's to say?


Lyra Jane - Jan 02, 2003 1:04:04 pm PST #2205 of 10001
Up with the sun

This is my informal tally, based on all posts about this today:

Yes -- 18 (Jim E-T, Betsy Hanes Perry, DavidS, Beverly, FayJay, justkim, Askye, Amchau, Katefate, Steph L., Lyra Jane, Nilly, Michele T., Sue, Laura, DXMachina, Sophia Brooks, Billytea) [EDIT: Meara and Knut make 20.]

No -- 4 (msbelle, ita, Kat, Burrell)

But I admit I was subjective about what was a vote -- e.g., I didn't count Jess as a no because she hasn't said that specifically, though she seems to lean that way.