mmmieskie is already inactive -- that happened this morning. As for /mieskie, you can't deactivate him usefully until he's validated his membership. But you can change the e-mail address and reset the password -- that way he'll never know what the new one is.
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Neither of them has the 'active' box checked.
What's that about?
Can I have permission to delete them/inactivate them?
Delete. Even if its not the same person (and it probably is), it's willful mischief to use the name at this point and bad form.
Jon, tell him that username is disallowed. I assume it's a different email addy?
I like Ita's method. It's clever.
E-mail addresses have to be unique.
As for /mieskie, you can't deactivate him usefully until he's validated his membership.
OK got it.
Shall we change the password right now?
I'm a bit confused about the right thing to do.
More to the point, who wants to send him email from the Admin account, and how should it be worded?
Hopefully secret message to Kat, since I've never white fonted before.
Thanks. I'd like that. I even signed up for the F2F, since it's Buffistas and local.
I like Ita's method. It's clever.
But he might think he hasn't been noticed sneaking back, just that he made a mistake with the password.
Someone should tell him outright that we see him trying to do it and we want him to stop.
I say it's a weird-ass name and it's not a coincidence.
I would recommend sending an email giving the reason for the deletion. (I don't know if this is already standard procedure?) Someday we could well have a genuine coincidence, after all.