He never confirmed his registration, Jon.
Mal ,'Our Mrs. Reynolds'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I thought we didn't get the "Joe Shmoe is the newest Buffista" email unless they confirmed. Am I incorrect?
I didn't say my warning was formal, but ita did.
The thing I think we have to be wary of is the "cool kids" factor.
A number of long time members have warned him
How would he know they were long-time members, and being devil's advocate, so what if they were?
We know who's been around for a while and who's a respected member of the community, but we don't want to lay ourselves open to the accusation that if the Popular Kids say you're being rude, then you're being rude, and that's sufficient.
The argument that "we're the community, and it's offensive, and we know what's offensive to the community because the community is us" is a rather circular one.
"The community standards are what the community says they are." That's not so much a circular argument as it is an axiom. You have to start somewhere, and we don't really have God's will or Natural Law to build on.
"We don't like this behavior. Nobody's defending you. Therefore it is, not necessarily bad, but not appropriate for this place."
Nope. The registration e-mail and the "is the newest" go out at the same time.
I think the "long time" is superfluous. Honestly, if Kiba was offended by what he had to say, f'rinstance, she would have every right to speak up and say so. If she was alone in her opinion, then it simply wouldn't be "a number".
When as many people chime as did, it's a community response, plain and simple.
There's a side of me that says "It's our board. We built it. We paid for it. We make the rules. If you think they're arbitrary - tough." There may come a time when, through normal turnover, the Stompy Feet and other posters can no longer make that claim. But until that time comes, I do not have any worries about "popular kids" or arguments about circular logic.
t /embracing my inner fascist
We don't like this behavior. Nobody's defending you.
Fair enough. I didn't mean that we did have Popular Kids whose opinion counted more, necessarily, I just mean that, along with the Hitler thing and the "she said something rude and you weren't mean to her!" thing, the next whinge is likely to be "you're a cabal, you're conspiring against me" and even "lots of people would support me but you're bullies and they don't want to speak out".
The thing I think we have to be wary of is the "cool kids" factor.
Frankly, I think that's going to happen no matter what. 9 times out of 10, when you smack someone down for being inappropriate, you get hit with the "clique" thing. Even when it was a very polite rebuke after they did something "helpful" like try to hack your board to find security holes.
lots of people would support me but you're bullies and they don't want to speak out
Hey, I'm with Jon. "The people who are supporting *me* are the people who signed checks. You want to support the rights of the differently mannered? Go build your own damned board."
The people who are supporting *me* are the people who signed checks.
Umm, I don't think the Buffistas that sent money have more rights than the ones that didn't. That's not all that building the board is about.