Lindsey: Why--why did you... Lorne: One last job. You're not part of the solution, Lindsey. You never will be. Lindsey: You kill me? A flunky?! I'm not just...Angel...kills me. You...Angel... Lorne: Good night, folks.

'Not Fade Away'


Buffista Fic: It Could Be Plot Bunnies  

Where the Buffistas let their fanfic creative juices flow. May contain erotica.


Deena - Jun 15, 2003 10:53:05 pm PDT #4249 of 10001
How are you me? You need to stop that. Only I can be me. ~Kara

That's a lovely rec, connie, and I agree that it's well-deserved. Am, that is so much fun. I shamefacedly confess that I don't really remember THHGTTG very well, but you're bringing it back to me. I couldn't even imagine how to write Caleb fic, but that drabble is very nice.

Love your drabble Deb. That's just good evil fun.


Am-Chau Yarkona - Jun 15, 2003 10:53:45 pm PDT #4250 of 10001
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty

Thanks, deb.

Edit: and Deena.

Deena! Good to see you!


deborah grabien - Jun 15, 2003 10:55:35 pm PDT #4251 of 10001
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

I just dozed off, literally, typing a reply to someone in LJ. Obviously nature's way of telling me the 300 mg of neurontin is kicking in.....

Night all.


Deena - Jun 15, 2003 11:00:12 pm PDT #4252 of 10001
How are you me? You need to stop that. Only I can be me. ~Kara

night Deb, sleep well.

Am, lovely to see you too. Isn't it awfully early there? oh, no, not now it's not, but I could have swore I saw a post from you earlier that would have been made around 5am your time. I'm up because Kara woke up crying about the window, though I'm not sure why. I rearranged things and rocked her and gave her a graham cracker and some milk and she seems to be going back to sleep.


Am-Chau Yarkona - Jun 15, 2003 11:17:24 pm PDT #4253 of 10001
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty

I could have swore I saw a post from you earlier that would have been made around 5am your time.

Um... unless I was posting in my sleep, this seems unlikely. You may be on crack, darling. I hope Kara gets back to sleep soon. (Edit: I'm guessing from Bitches that she has.) And t /natter


Calli - Jun 16, 2003 8:40:43 am PDT #4254 of 10001
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs

Ah, the PoV debate. My PoV preferences are all personal and reader-centric.

Anyway, for me 3rd person narrative is like watching a story. The prose acts like a camera. I find it easy to fall into this kind of text because all it takes is one point of lasting interest -- a character (usually), a plot line, or an idea -- to keep me in the story.

First person narrative is more like listening to a story on the radio or from a person next to me. Not only do I have to find something in the text to like, I'm also much more strongly affected by the narrative voice. There may be a fascinating charcter going through amazing events culminating in a rewriting of all I thought was true. But if the person/character narrating the story does something to turn me off I'll probably never know. This doesn't mean that first person stories aren't good or are any harder or easier to write. But it does mean that there's a better chance they'll lose me.

And then there's second person. Every time a second person narrative says, "You do [X]," I hold it up to a mental chart. Am I doing [X]? No? Odds are you lost me. If I never have done [X], or likely never will do [X], then I'm out of there. It's almost impossible for me to get lost in a story, no matter how well written, if I'm constantly getting thrown out of it by internally contradictory statements.

"You lick the drops of blood from the shallow cuts you made on Wesley's abdomen." Nope.

"I licked the drops of blood from the shallow cuts I'd made on Wesley's abdomen." Maybe. If "I" is Faith, you betcha. If "I" is Andrew, I'll need some really convincing backstory.

"Gunn licked the drops of blood from the shallow cuts Faith had made on Wesley's abdomen." You betcha.


deborah grabien - Jun 16, 2003 8:59:57 am PDT #4255 of 10001
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

"I licked the drops of blood from the shallow cuts I'd made on Wesley's abdomen." Maybe. If "I" is Faith, you betcha. If "I" is Andrew, I'll need some really convincing backstory.

See, I take this on, er, faith (there must be another non-Buffyish way of phrasing this!). If I'm going to bother to read the story, I have to begin by trusting the writer. If I can't trust the writer to be who they say they are, I can't imagine bothering to read the story anyway, so the POV doesn't come into it for me. It wouldn't matter.

Totally with you on second person POV. That one always kickstarts the internal blinkies, as a reader. As a writer, I virtually never go there.

As a writer, about 99% of what I write is third person. I'm just aware how easy it is to plump up and play God that way, so I have to watch out that it doesn't turn masturbatory and self-congratulatory: ooooh, lookee, I can make the characters dance!

Nothing intrinsically wrong with that, I suppose, but as a personal taste? I dislike reading it, shrug and move on when I see it, and I always want to kick myself when I catch myself doing it. I don't mind references to the same things in serial fiction or fic, mind you; I just don't want to see the writer leaning over the top of the puppet theatre, yanking strings maniacally.

Again, your reader/writer mileage will almost certainly vary wildly.


P.M. Marc - Jun 16, 2003 9:15:12 am PDT #4256 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

"Gunn licked the drops of blood from the shallow cuts Faith had made on Wesley's abdomen." You betcha.

Can he be nekkid?

Randomly:

I think I was having POV thoughts in the shower, relating to the notion of POV, 1st person, as being seen as more narcissistic than, say 3rd person, and realizing that the Single Most Narcissisitic Self Insertion I've ever seen was decidedly third person. (CoughLevinSueCough)

While I'm more with Calli on 1st person as a reader (it's easier for it to lose me than 3rd person), I have read a lot of 1st person, The Color Purple, I Have No Mouth, Yet I Must Scream, Surfacing, that sucked me in deeper than 3rd person.

This is me, avoiding site redesigns.


deborah grabien - Jun 16, 2003 9:20:03 am PDT #4257 of 10001
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

Run, Plei! Run from the evil site redesigns! There are cookies coming atcha!

BTW, I should say that in the rare cases when second person is perfectly suited to its task, it can be ghostly, staggeringly effective for me to read becuse of its very detachment. But alas, I rarely see it done that well.

And in drabbles, the ultra-short form? I've seen superb stuff in all shapes and voices. Everything seems to work when the form is that taut.

(edit" GAH! I typoed "site" three times.)


Calli - Jun 16, 2003 9:34:42 am PDT #4258 of 10001
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs

See, I take this on, er, faith (there must be another non-Buffyish way of phrasing this!). If I'm going to bother to read the story, I have to begin by trusting the writer. If I can't trust the writer to be who they say they are, I can't imagine bothering to read the story anyway, so the POV doesn't come into it for me. It wouldn't matter.

With a writer whose work I know, this would be true. I'll give a writer I like all kinds of rope, because I'll trust they won't hang themselves with it. If I ran into a story by a writer who I'd never heard of, she'd have to earn my trust. There are all kinds of ways to do that with me if the writing's good. But I won't take nearly as much on, um, faith, in trusting the first person narrative or anything else.