They have an external CD drive for $99, and they also have a new bit of software called Remote Drive which allows you to use the CD or DVD drive on another machine across the network, even a drive in a PC.
Oliver ,'Conviction (1)'
Buffistechnology 3: "Press Some Buttons, See What Happens."
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
They have an external CD drive for $99
I saw that; I just know my habits too well, and if there's a second "piece," so to speak, for my laptop, odds are astronomically high that I'll leave the external CD drive at home on the day that I need it most.
It's better if my laptop has everything in one piece.
It's not the hardware; it's me and my forgetful ways.
That's the beauty of Remote Disk. If there is another computer with an optical drive in the area, you can use it as the optical drive for the MacBook Air. You aren't screwed if you forget the external.
Huh. So the fancier faster option gets you less HD storage, but it's flash.
It's so terribly terribly pretty, but completely unjustifiable for me. For which I'm kinda grateful.
Yeah, the more I look at it, the less I think it is for me, unless I also got a desk top, which I have been considering for somewhere down the line.
It is very pretty though.
If there is another computer with an optical drive in the area, you can use it as the optical drive for the MacBook Air. You aren't screwed if you forget the external.
Don't you need to install software on the remote machine, or am I misunderstanding? It's still really cool, but it may not always be convenient.
You can configure the HD one with the faster processor.
If there is another computer with an optical drive in the area, you can use it as the optical drive for the MacBook Air.
But you have to be able to install software on that computer, which makes it less handy.
Yeah, it looks like you need to install a bit of software on the other machine.
You can configure the HD one with the faster processor.
I just think it's interesting that they didn't. Are they relying on their audience being either geeky enough to want solid state despite smaller HD, or ungeeky enough to never notice that the HD is smaller in their second canned config?